Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
10-Jan-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
16-Jan-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
18-Jan-23 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
19-Jul-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
19-Jul-21 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Act2 Din Wind Pvt. Limited, established in November 2015, is a Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (RE IPP) operating under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, as authorized by AEDB. The Company is led by Mr. Khurshid Akhtar, the CEO, who holds an MBA from LUMS. The total estimated cost of the project is USD 62.952 million, with 80% of the project cost (USD 50.36mln), financed through debt. This debt is sourced from foreign financial institutions and locally from SBP under the refinancing scheme at a fixed rate of 5%. The foreign loan has a tenor of 13 years, including a 2-year grace period and quarterly repayments, while the local loan has a tenor of 10 years with a 2-year grace period. The current sponsors include Din Group (49%), Ismail Group (20%), Akhter Group (15.50%) and Tapal Group (15.5%).

Rating Rationale

Act2 Din Wind (Pvt.) Limited (“Act2 Din Wind or the Company”) is 50MW wind power plant located at Jhimpir, Sindh. Act2 Din Wind has entered into a 25-year Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with CPPA-G (the power purchaser), effective from the Commercial Operations Date (COD). The Company achieved COD on February 27, 2022, and has been supplying electricity to the national grid since that time. As per the EPA, in case of non-project missed volumes the power purchaser shall be liable to pay the missed volumes calculated using tariff rates. However, the Company’s revenues and cash flows are subject to wind risk, as seasonal variations in wind speed impact electricity generation, leading to potential seasonality in cash flows. The Company maintains comprehensive insurance coverage to mitigate the risks of business interruptions and other related damages. During FY24, Act2 Din Wind generated ~115GWh of electricity (FY23: ~138.7GWh) with an efficiency factor of 26.3% (FY23: 31.6%). Despite the lower generation compared to the previous year, the Company recorded a topline of PKR ~2,372mln (FY23: PKR ~1,959mln, benefiting from USD and CPI indexation incorporated in the tariff structure. As a result, the Company achieved a net profit of PKR ~694mln (FY23: PKR ~438.6mln). Act2 Din Wind fulfills its working capital requirements through internally generated cash flows, without relying on short-term borrowing facilities. However, as a prudent measure, the Company has secured sufficient working capital lines that can be utilized if necessary. The Company's free cash flows are strong, ensuring timely debt repayments. Additionally, The Company is maintaining the Debt Service Reserve Account (DSRA), which is backed by 6 months SBLCs, in total providing coverage of six months on its financial obligations till maturity. While Act2 Din Wind's leveraging remains significant, it is gradually declining in line with the project's lifecycle, as the repayment of project-related loans is underway. As of FY24, approximately 13% of loans have been repaid as scheduled. The Company has applied for the true-up of its tariff, which is currently under review by the authority. Currently, the indexation provided is on an interim basis and will be subject to adjustments, if necessary, based on the final decision of the authority.

Key Rating Drivers

Comfort is derived from the company’s association with a strong sponsor, distinguished by sound financial backing and relevant industry expertise. Maintaining and improving operational performance in line with agreed performance levels is essential. Furthermore, sustaining financial discipline remains a key factor for the ratings. Any changes in the regulatory environment could potentially impact the ratings, going forward.

Profile
Plant

Act2 Din Wind Private Limited (the "Company" or "Act2 Din Wind") is a Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (RE IPP) established under the Renewable Energy Policy of 2006. The Company operates a 50 MW wind power plant located in Jhimpir, District Thatta, Sindh. Act2 Din Wind successfully achieved its Commercial Operations Date (COD) on February 27, 2022.

Tariff

Act2 Din Wind has been granted a cost-plus tariff under NEPRA's 2019 tariff determination for wind IPPs. The Company is entitled to a generation tariff of PKR 7.2340 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for the first 10 years and PKR 2.3790 per kWh for years 11 to 25. At the time of financial close, the project's levelized tariff was set at US¢ 4.7212 per kWh. The Company has submitted a request for the true-up of its tariff, which is currently under review by the authority. The indexation being provided is interim and subject to adjustments based on the authority's final decision. As of October-December 2024, the indexed tariff stands at PKR 13.8538 per kWh.

Return on Project

The IRR of the project, as agreed with NEPRA, is 14%.

Ownership
Ownership Structure

Act2 Wind is owned by a consortium comprising Din Group (49%), Ismail Group (20%), Akhter Group (15.5%), and Tapal Group (15.5%).

Stability

The ownership structure of Act2 Din Wind demonstrates stability, supported by the strong presence of its sponsors in the energy sector. Initially, the Company was established by the Ismail Group, Akhter Group, and Tapal Group, each holding equal shares. However, in November 2021, Din Group acquired a 49% stake by purchasing 13.33% from the Ismail Group and 17.83% from the Akhter and Tapal Groups, respectively. This restructuring reflects the strategic alignment and commitment of the sponsors to the Company's long-term success. Given the consortium's significant experience and presence in the energy sector, the ownership structure is expected to remain stable in the medium to long term.

Business Acumen

The sponsor groups of Act2 Din Wind are prominent, diversified conglomerates with strong business portfolios and a significant presence in the energy sector, particularly renewable energy. Din Group is a major player in the textile industry, contributing extensively to Pakistan’s export sector. Ismail Group, is one of the Country’s largest consumer goods companies, manufacturing products under brands like CandyLand, Bisconni, SnackCity, and Astro Films, and also holds a decent stake in The Bank of Khyber. Akhter Group is involved in technology and industrial manufacturing with a growing focus on sustainable energy. Tapal Group, consisting of Ameejee Valleejee & Sons, Tapal Enterprises, and Tapal Energy, has significant expertise in power generation, particularly through its 126 MW RFO-based power plant. Additionally, the sponsors, both individually or collectively, have interests in five wind power plants with a combined capacity of 250 MW, further demonstrating their strategic focus on renewable energy and their overall business acumen

Financial Strength

The Company’s sponsors, with their strong financial muscle, have the capacity to support the entity both on an ongoing basis and during times of crisis.

Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors (BoD) consists of six members, including the CEO. DIN Group, being the major shareholder, has three representatives on the board, while Akhter Group, Ismail Group, and Tapal Group each have one director.

Members’ Profile

Mr. Mustafa Tapal is currently the Chairman of the BoD. The Chairman is nominated on a rotational basis from each group for a term of two years, starting from the first BoD meeting. However, the Chairman may continue in the role for a longer term with the consensus of the board members. Mr. Tapal has served as Chairman since the Company's inception. The other BoD include Mr. Fawad Jawed, Mr. Farhan Sheikh Mohammad, and Mr. Faraz Jawed, representing Din Group, while Mr. Khurshid Akhtar represents Akhter Group, and Mr. Asad Muhammad Iqbal represents Ismail Group. These members possess the requisite knowledge and experience, contributing valuable insights and expertise to the Company.

Board Effectiveness

The BoD has extensive experience across various sectors, including finance, accounting, project management, construction, and manufacturing. The Company's board members engage in regular discussions, where key matters such as plant efficiency and the Company’s performance are thoroughly reviewed. They also provide guidance to the management in developing effective policies to drive the Company’s growth and success

Financial Transparency

The Company's external auditor, BDO Ebrahim & Co. ranked as “A” category auditor by ICAP, expressed an unqualified opinion on the company’s financial statements as at end-Jun24.

Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a flat organizational structure, primarily consisting of finance and technical staff, while the engineering, construction, and operations of the plant are outsourced. However, the reporting lines are clearly demarcated, ensuring efficient communication and accountability within the Company.

Management Team

The CEO is elected by the BoD on a rotational basis from each group for a term of two years. However, the CEO's term may be extended by mutual consensus among the board members. Mr. Khurshid Akhter, is the CEO, who has been leading the Company since its inception, brings over two decades of diverse industry experience. He is supported by a skilled and experienced management team. Mr. Farhan Iqbal, serving as the CFO and Company Secretary, is assisted by a capable team that ensures the smooth financial and regulatory operations of the Company.

Effectiveness

The management functions are clear and well-defined, ensuring the effective achievement of the Company's goals and objectives. The board members closely oversee the team to ensure successful execution. Additionally, the management holds regular meetings to discuss Company affairs.

Control Environment

The Company has progressively enhanced its IT solutions, enabling improved performance across various areas. The quality of its IT infrastructure and the range of activities it supports have shown steady improvement, effectively aiding in monitoring operations and management reporting.

Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

Act2 Din Wind is being developed under the Renewable Energy Policy of 2006. The Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with CPPA-G spans a tenure of 25 years, commencing from the COD - February 27, 2022 According to the EPA, the Company is obligated to generate electricity in line with the benchmark generation while maintaining the required efficiency. Any decline in generation due to an efficiency drop will not be compensated by the power purchaser. However, in the event of curtailment in offtake by the power purchaser, the Company will be compensated for the missed volumes, termed Non-Project Missed Volumes (NPMV). These volumes will be calculated using previous generation trend and paid at the rate of applicable tariffs.

Operation and Maintenance

The Company has signed a long-term Operations & Maintenance (O&M) contract with Hydro China for the plant and Goldwind for the turbines. Hydro China, currently serving as the O&M contractor for several wind IPPs in Pakistan, including Act Wind 1, has a proven track record of providing satisfactory services. Both Hydro China and Goldwind bring extensive expertise in engineering, design, and the operations of renewable energy projects.

Resource Risk

Resource variability risk is a unique challenge for Renewable Energy IPPs. For wind farms, this risk arises from their reliance on wind as a key resource, making them inherently exposed to wind risk. Under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, wind risk is defined as the variability in wind speed, which directly affects the energy output of the wind IPP. According to the tariff structure, the Company fully absorbs the risk associated with wind variability. Consequently, the Company’s revenues and cash flows are influenced by seasonal variations in wind speed, which impact electricity generation and may result in fluctuations in cash flows.

Insurance Cover

The company has adequate insurance coverage for property damage and business interruption.

Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

FY-2024, Pakistan's power generation declined by 1.9%, totaling 127,160 GWh. This marks the second consecutive year of reduced output, driven by elevated electricity costs, rising inflation, and lower economic activity. The Country's power generation remains heavily reliant on thermal and hydel sources, contributing approx. 45% and 31%, respectively, in FY24. The share of nuclear energy has notably increased to approx.19% in FY24, while renewable energy sources continue to constitute a modest 5% of the total generation. Recently, the Government of Pakistan (GoP) resumed negotiations with Independent Power Producers (IPPs) and established a special task force to implement structural reforms in the power sector. The ongoing process aims to lower generation costs and make electricity more affordable, although the outcomes of these negotiations are yet to be seen

Generation

During FY24, the net electrical output generated was 115,199 MWh (FY23: 138,669 MWh), compared to the benchmark generation of 166,440 MWh. The load factor for FY24 stood at 26.30% (FY23: 31.66%).

Performance Benchmark

The capacity factor set by NEPRA is 38%. Act2 Din Wind’s efficiency factor for FY24 remained at 26.3% due to lower wind speeds. However, this efficiency level was sufficient to support the Company’s operations effectively, including debt servicing

Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

The total project cost is USD 62.95mln, consisting of 80% of debt (USD 50.36ml) and 20% of equity (USD 12.59mln). The debt financing constitutes foreign loan of USD 25mln (3MLIBOR+4.25%) and local loan of PKR 4.5bln (SBP refinancing rate of 3%+2%). The local loan is eligible for refinancing under the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) Financing Scheme for Renewable Energy. The foreign loan has a maturity of 13 years while the local loan has maturity of 10 years. Both the local and foreign loans are repayable in quarterly installments. The loan balance outstanding as of June 2024 is PKR 9,466mln

Liquidity Profile

As of end-June 2024, the Company’s total receivables stood at PKR 591 million (FY23: PKR 790 million), with receivable days decreasing from 114 days in FY23 to 106 days in FY24. This reduction in receivable days reflects a slight improvement in the payment cycle, thereby enhancing the Company’s liquidity position.

Working Capital Financing

Act2 Din Wind fulfills its working capital requirements through internally generated cash flows, without relying on short-term borrowing facilities. However, as a prudent measure, the Company has secured sufficient working capital lines that can be utilized if necessary.

Cash Flow Analysis

The Company’s Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) has increased, standing at PKR 1,231mln for FY24 (FY23: PKR 903mln), driven by a better Profit After Tax of PKR 694mln (FY23: PKR 438mln). The Company’s strong free cash flows ensure timely debt repayments. Additionally, the Company maintains a Debt Service Reserve Account (DSRA), which is backed by six months of Standby Letters of Credit (SBLCs), providing coverage for its financial obligations for six months until maturity.

Capitalization

The Company’s equity stands at PKR 3,447mln as of June 2024, with 13% of the project debt repaid. The current leverage ratio is 73.8%. The debt on the balance sheet primarily reflects project-related long-term loans, and the leveraging ratio is expected to decline gradually with timely debt repayments

 
 

Jan-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 11,979 12,702 11,161
2. Investments 543 164 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 816 1,494 2,047
a. Inventories 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 591 790 436
5. Total Assets 13,338 14,360 13,208
6. Current Liabilities 154 880 1,415
a. Trade Payables 89 757 1,388
7. Borrowings 9,466 10,458 9,226
8. Related Party Exposure 257 257 245
9. Non-Current Liabilities 13 11 8
10. Net Assets 3,447 2,753 2,314
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,447 2,753 2,314
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,372 1,960 599
a. Cost of Good Sold (901) (778) (267)
2. Gross Profit 1,471 1,182 332
a. Operating Expenses (33) (43) (24)
3. Operating Profit 1,438 1,139 308
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 128 45 156
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,566 1,184 464
a. Total Finance Cost (851) (740) (163)
b. Taxation (21) (6) (2)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 694 439 299
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,231 903 482
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 1,234 905 484
c. Changes in Working Capital (616) (717) 906
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 618 188 1,390
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (189) (2,166) (6,238)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (993) 1,242 5,342
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (564) (736) 494
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 21.0% 227.3% N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin 62.0% 60.3% 55.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 29.3% 22.4% 49.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 26.0% 9.5% 231.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 19.4% 16.6% 17.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 106 114 266
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 41 -86 -166
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 5.3 1.7 1.4
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.5 1.2 3.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.7 0.6 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 25.6 65.4 29.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 73.8% 79.6% 80.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 8.3% 7.4% 2.2%

Jan-25

www.pacra.com

Jan-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jan-25

www.pacra.com