Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
18-Jun-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
01-Aug-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
01-Aug-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
02-Aug-22 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Multinet Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated in 1996, as a private limited Company. Primary business activity of the Company is to provide telecommunications infrastructure and services. Major shareholding (99%) resides with Mr. Adnan Asdar Ali. The product slate of the Company comprises provision of broadband & data connectivity related services to corporates, long-haul and metro optical fiber infrastructure requirements for telecom operators, international voice termination, fixed line telephony, and partnering with global carriers to provide broadband and data connectivity solutions to their customers operating in Pakistan. Moreover, it also provides value added services such as voice services, data center, audio and video conferencing, hosting applications and servers.

Rating Rationale

The ratings of Multinet Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited ("Multinet" or the "Company") reflect its robust business profile and solid standing within Pakistan’s telecommunications industry. Multinet is a leading technology Company renowned for delivering innovative, high-impact solutions tailored to the evolving needs of businesses. Driven by a deep commitment to technological excellence and client success, the Company empowers organizations to thrive in today’s digital landscape. Multinet’s comprehensive solutions portfolio includes Metro Fiber and Long Haul Networks, Tower Fiber infrastructure, Data Centers, Cloud Platforms, Information Security services, and Global Communication Assets. Backed by extensive industry experience and a forward-looking approach, Multinet has established a strong reputation for providing reliable, cutting-edge technology solutions to businesses across Pakistan. The Company offers a suite of value-added services such as voice solutions, data center services, audio and video conferencing, as well as application and server hosting. The assigned rating reflects a sound governance framework, a strong control environment, and a highly qualified and experienced management team. Furthermore, the company has proactively enhanced its governance structures, evidenced by the strengthening of its Board. The Company secured a loan facility from HBL, backed by a guarantee from InfraZamin. The facility was originally sanctioned at PKR 2.1bln and was intended to finance the procurement of data center racks, expansion of long-haul capacity, metro network development, tower fiberization, and the maintenance of the Debt Service Reserve Account (DSRA). However, following an increase in markup rates, the facility amount was revised to PKR 1.0bln. The proceeds have since been utilized for the installation of 100 additional data center racks, expansion of the metro fiber network, tower fiberization, and the ongoing maintenance of the DSRA. The Company's topline recorded a 6.8% increase, primarily driven by the robust performance of its domestic operations. Notably, the Enterprise business unit posted a growth of 15%, reflecting increased demand for integrated ICT solutions and enterprise connectivity services. Similarly, the Carrier Domestic business unit delivered a strong performance with a 20% growth rate, attributed to the expansion of wholesale domestic traffic and infrastructure leasing. In contrast, the Carrier Business Unit International and Long Distance International segments experienced a decline in revenue due to shift in communication trends which continue to impact the topline. The Company demonstrated enhanced profitability, with the gross profit margin expanding by 16%, indicative of robust cost containment strategies. This positive momentum cascaded down to the operating profit, which also recorded an improvement. Net profit margin experienced a substantial uplift of 116%, primarily driven by optimized overall expense management. Concurrently, debt coverage metrics have strengthened, reflecting an improvement in FCFO. The Company continues to uphold a conservative capital structure, as evidenced by an improved leverage ratio.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the management's ability to realize the projected margins, working capital cycle and coverages.

Profile
Legal Structure

Multinet Pakistan Pvt. Limited (‘Multinet’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in 1996, as a private limited company


Background

The Company was founded by Mr. Adnan Asdar Ali and Mr. Nasser Khan Ghazi in 1996, and began as the branded reseller of internet and data connectivity services. Later in 2006, the 89% majority shareholding was acquired by TM International Limited (now called Axiata) of Telekom Malaysia. In Nov-18, Axiata fully exited from Multinet, transferring all of the shareholding to Mr. Adnan Asdar Ali. Multinet is currently engaged in providing connectivity infrastructure and solutions to Telecos, corporates, SMEs, and financial institutions.


Operations

Primary business activity of the Company are to provide telecommunication, electronic media and connectivity infrastructure and solutions, including internet services, design, development, implementation of networks. Moreover, value added services include voice services, data center, audio and video conferencing, hosting applications and servers.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership of the company is predominantly concentrated, with Mr. Adnan Asdar Ali holding an 99.9% stake. The remaining shares are modestly distributed among the company’s directors, CEO, and VP of Energy.


Stability

Ownership of the Company seems stable. The Sponsor has a respectable standing in the technology segment.


Business Acumen

Mr. Adnan Asdar Ali, the Chairman and co-founder of the Company, has more than 37 years of experience in connectivity-based solutions and network infrastructure. He co-founded the Company in 1996, and is responsible for building partnerships and synergies with renowned technology manufacturers.


Financial Strength

Financial strength of the Sponsor is considered adequate. Moreover, the Sponsor is engaged in software houses, telemedicine, water filtration and mobile application development, through multiple associated companies.


Governance
Board Structure

Board of Directors comprises of 4 members. Mr. Adnan Asdar Ali serves as an Executive Director, while Mr. Sohail P. Ahmad, Joozer JiwaKhan and Anwar Ali Khan serves as an Independent Director.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Adnan Asdar Ali, the co-founder, has more than 37 years of experience in connectivity-based solutions and network infrastructure


Board Effectiveness

Last year, the Board established an audit committee to ensure the seamless execution of the audit process. Mr. Sohail P. Ahmad has been appointed as the chair of the committee.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s external auditors, Baker Tilly Mehmood Idrees Qamar have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for the year ended Dec-24. The firm is QCR rated and is in SBP’s category ‘A’ panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational structure reflects clear reporting lines and is split between Operations, Administrative, Legal, Human Resource and Business Development. Each function is monitored by head of department, who reports to the CEO


Management Team

The management comprises experienced and qualified individuals. Mr. Adnan Hayat Zaidi, the Chief Executive Officer, is an IT graduate. He has more than 22 years of experience in the technology industry, and has been a part of the Company since 2002. Mr. Umer Zahoor, the CFO, is a Chartered Accountant and has an overall experience of 15+ years. He is associated with the Company since 2014.


Effectiveness

The Company has one management committee in place named Steering Committee. It includes all the departmental heads, along with the CEO (Mr. Adnan Hayat Zaidi). Policies, procedures, budgets and key performance parameters are discussed in the committee meetings regularly to review activity. Whereas, weekly and monthly reports are shared with the CEO regarding the projects’ status.


MIS

The Company has developed oracle as its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System.


Control Environment

EY is the company's internal auditor, conducting quarterly reviews of internal controls and submitting reports to the Board of Directors to maintain strong operational control.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

With a growing youth population, increasing internet penetration and thriving startup ecosystem, Pakistan is poised to become a significant player in digital economy and achieve the goal of national growth and prosperity. From July 2023 to June 2024, Pakistan’s IT exports reached $3.223 billion, compared to $2.596 billion in the same period of the previous financial year. The IT industry is striving to increase IT exports with the full support of SIFC (Special Investment Facilitation Council), IT ministry, Pakistan Software Export Board. The present coalition government is paying special attention towards information technology (IT) and had earmarked over Rs79 billion for it in the budget 2024-25, the highest allocation in country’s history.


Relative Position

25% of cellular traffic and 50% of financial market traffic runs through Multinet Pakistan Pvt. Limited.



Revenues

The Company has segregated revenue streams according to nature of its clientele. There are four different business units of the Company: 

Enterprise Business Units (EBU): Information Communication and Technology (ICT) services are provided to corporates and SMEs. Corporates include financial institutions and multinational companies. EBUs contributed PKR 3,368mln (CY23: PKR 2,908mln) to the total revenue during CY24.

Carrier Business Unit Domestic (CBUD): In this segment, local telecom operators, Internet Service Providers, and Cable Operators are provided infrastructure for connectivity. These include long term contracts with Telenor Pakistan, China Mobile, Transworld and Mobilink. This Contributed PKR 787mln during FY24 (FY23: PKR 676mln).

Carrier Business Unit International (CBUI): The Company caters to international data and voice businesses with global operators. These include Tata Communications, Telebiz International, Verizon Business and BICs among others. This unit contributed PKR 787mln during CY24 (CY23: PKR 676mln).

Long Distance International (LDI): The Company offers global coverage for long distance international voice calls with routing and billing options. Revenue contribution stood at PKR 82mln during CY24 (CY23: PKR 135mln)  

The Company demonstrated robust financial performance in CY24, marked by a significant 6.8% growth in topline, reaching PKR 4.8 billion. This represents a strong recovery from the 6.2% contraction experienced in CY23, highlighting the effectiveness of strategic initiatives. Gross profitability witnessed a substantial uplift in CY24, with Gross Profit expanding to PKR 1.7 billion from PKR 1.3 billion in the prior year. This PKR 400 million increase underscores improved cost management and/or pricing power. Operational efficiency gains are evident in the more than doubling of Operating Profit to PKR 536 million in CY24 (CY23: PKR 231 million). This significant improvement reflects enhanced operational management and expense control. The Company's bottom line exhibited strong positive momentum, with Net Profit more than doubling to PKR 255 million in CY24, a substantial increase from PKR 112 million in CY23. This significant growth underscores the overall strengthening of the Company's financial health and profitability.


Margins

The observed expansion in the Company's profitability margins signals a notable strengthening of its financial profile. The gross profit margin improved significantly to 35% in CY24 from 30% in the prior year, indicating enhanced cost efficiencies in the production and service delivery process. This improvement suggests a greater proportion of revenue is translating directly into profit before operating expenses. Furthermore, the operating profit margin demonstrated substantial progress, reaching 11% in CY24, a considerable increase from the 5.1% recorded in CY23. This expansion underscores improved operational management and a more effective control over operating expenditures relative to the revenue base. The net profit margin also exhibited a positive trajectory, rising to 5.2% in CY24 from 2.4% in CY23. This improvement at the bottom line reflects the combined effects of the enhanced gross and operating profit margins, indicating a greater ability to convert revenue into net earnings. This strengthening of the net profit margin is a key indicator of overall financial health and profitability. The consistent improvement across gross, operating, and net profit margins suggests a positive trend in the Company's earnings generation capacity and overall financial efficiency. These margin expansions provide a more robust foundation for future profitability and cash flow generation, which are important considerations in our credit assessment.


Sustainability

The Company has started to fiberize towers in Pakistan, which will be imperative for 5G technology and to cater the increasing user base. Curently 1000 towers have been fiberized. For this purpose, the management has availed an Infrazamin credit guarantee backed long-term loan of PKR 2.1bln from HBL currently loan amount restricted to 1,038mln.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company demonstrated enhanced efficiency in its working capital management during CY24. Inventory days improved to 19 days from 22 days in the previous year, indicating a quicker turnover of stock and potentially reduced holding costs. Similarly, the Company achieved a reduction in trade receivable days, which stood at 68 days in CY24 compared to 72 days in CY23, suggesting more effective collection processes. Consequently, the gross working capital cycle shortened to 87 days in CY24 from 94 days in CY23, reflecting an overall improvement in the time taken to convert inventory and receivables into cash. Furthermore, payable days also decreased to 128 days in CY24 from 144 days in CY23, indicating a potentially faster payment cycle to suppliers. The net working capital days remained negative but moved from -50 days in CY23 to -41 days in CY24. While a negative net working capital cycle can be a sign of efficient cash management, the slight increase warrants monitoring to ensure it is not indicative of undue pressure on supplier payments. Overall, the improvements in inventory days and trade receivable days contributed positively to a more efficient working capital cycle for the Company.


Coverages

The Company exhibited a notable improvement in its funds from continuing operations (FCFO), which increased to PKR 828 million in CY24 from PKR 577 million in the prior year. This strengthening in FCFO provides a larger pool of internally generated funds available to service debt obligations and fund operational needs. Despite an increase in finance costs to PKR 414 million in CY24 (CY23: PKR 330 million), the Company's FCFO to finance cost coverage improved to 2.2x in CY24 from 1.8x in CY23. This indicates an enhanced ability to meet its interest expenses from its core operating cash flows. The total coverage ratio also showed positive momentum, rising to 0.4x in CY24 from 0.3x in CY23, suggesting a slightly improved capacity to cover total debt obligations with its FCFO. The increase in FCFO more than offset the rise in finance costs, resulting in stronger debt service coverage metrics for the Company.


Capitalization

The Company maintains a conservative capital structure, evidenced by a leverage ratio of 21%. This prudent approach to financing is further highlighted by a reduction in overall borrowings, which stood at PKR 1.7 billion in CY24 compared to PKR 2.0 billion in the prior year. Notably, the composition of the Company's debt portfolio indicates a low reliance on short-term financing, with only 2% of total borrowings categorized as short-term. This emphasis on longer-term funding sources mitigates potential refinancing risks and supports a stable financial foundation. The combination of a low leverage ratio and a predominantly long-term debt profile suggests a measured and sustainable approach to capital management.


 
 

Jun-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 10,502 10,630 10,589
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 1,139 1,154 996
4. Current Assets 3,398 3,489 2,807
a. Inventories 160 349 204
b. Trade Receivables 826 988 810
5. Total Assets 15,039 15,273 14,392
6. Current Liabilities 4,484 4,608 3,748
a. Trade Payables 1,542 1,883 1,714
7. Borrowings 1,783 2,073 2,137
8. Related Party Exposure 63 68 71
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,823 1,893 1,917
10. Net Assets 6,886 6,631 6,520
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,886 6,631 6,520
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 4,872 4,564 4,866
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,166) (3,185) (3,308)
2. Gross Profit 1,706 1,378 1,557
a. Operating Expenses (1,170) (1,147) (1,013)
3. Operating Profit 536 231 545
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 369 389 141
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 905 621 686
a. Total Finance Cost (414) (330) (251)
b. Taxation (236) (179) (128)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 255 112 307
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 828 577 932
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 381 270 704
c. Changes in Working Capital 172 327 (19)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 553 597 685
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 52 (397) (1,035)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (506) (61) 387
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 98 139 36
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 6.8% -6.2% 10.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 35.0% 30.2% 32.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 5.2% 2.4% 6.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 20.5% 19.8% 18.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 3.8% 1.7% 4.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 87 94 66
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -41 -50 -36
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.8 0.8 0.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.9 2.5 4.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.4 0.3 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 6.6 12.3 4.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 21.1% 24.4% 25.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 33.4 79.5 71.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 19.4% 14.3% 12.6%

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-25

www.pacra.com