Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Apr-25 BBB A3 Stable Upgrade -
26-Apr-24 BBB- A3 Positive Maintain -
28-Apr-23 BBB- A3 Stable Maintain -
29-Apr-22 BBB- A3 Stable Upgrade -
21-Aug-21 BB+ A3 Positive Maintain YES
About the Entity

AGAHE Pakistan, incorporated in 2016 as a Public Company Limited by Guarantee under Section 42 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now Companies Act, 2017), is licensed by SECP under the NBFC Rules, 2003. The Institution is governed by a 7-member Board of Directors chaired by Mr. Abid Aman Barki, with Mr. Barak Ullah serving as CEO, overseeing a professional team.

Rating Rationale

The assigned rating emanates from the adequate profile of the Agahe Pakistan (“the MFI”) in the Microfinance sector of Pakistan. Agahe Pakistan operates as a not-for-profit organization and under the regulatory purview of the SECP under Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2017. Agahe Pakistan primarily focuses on empowering women and youth by enhancing their economic standard through access to business loans. The MFI is expanding its footprint in the Punjab region to induce growth and manage NPLs optimally. Currently has MFI has strong presence in Punjab Province with a network of 44 branches. Through these branches, the MFI continues to drive financial inclusion and economic empowerment across the region. The Gross loan portfolio (GLP) includes diversified products across segments such as General Business, Livestock, Micro-Enterprise, Renewable Energy, Auto, Educational, Islamic Financing and House Loans. The MFI has diverse borrowing avenues, including the PMIC, SBP, NBP, HBL, BOP, and JSBL, which strengthens its funding base. Previously, Pakistan’s economy navigated significant macroeconomic headwinds. However, the improvement has been observed during the first half of FY25 marked by a gradual easing of policy rates and a sizeable reduction in inflation. These positive economic indicators are expected to provide crucial support to various sectors, including Microfinance. According to management accounts, the MFI's GLP demonstrated consistent growth, reaching ~PKR2.3bln as of ~9MFY25, compared to ~PKR1.9bln in FY24. The MFI posted a net profit of ~PKR 174mln. Net profitability increased to ~PKR174mln in 9MFY25 from ~PKR145mln in FY24. Additionally, the sustained year-on-year growth in GLP, coupled with the ability to maintain a low infection ratio of ~1.3%, highlights improvements in both qualitative and quantitative performance indicators. The MFI’s board comprises reputable, well-educated individuals with diverse experience, actively guiding strategic decisions and ensuring the MFI’s direction aligns with corporate governance best practices. The MFI benefits from a stable, experienced senior management team, supported by clear reporting lines, a formalized organogram, and effective monitoring processes. Integration with the head office enables real-time tracking of recoveries and disbursements, while technological advancements have strengthened the control environment. The rating upgrade reflects the Company’s key operational improvements, including the digitalization of processes, the implementation of advanced MIS, and the development of a borrower risk rating score model. Additionally, the sustained year-on-year growth in GLP, coupled with the ability to maintain a low infection ratio of ~1%, highlights improvements in both qualitative and quantitative performance indicators. Moreover, the strategic direction and vision provided by AGAHE Pakistan’s Board, comprising experienced and highly qualified professionals, continue to play a pivotal role in driving the Company’s sustainable growth and development.

Key Rating Drivers

The sustainability of positive performance amid growing business volumes is a key factor in the Company’s rating. Future rating action will be contingent upon a thorough evaluation of strategic deliverables and their outcomes. In this context, the Company’s ongoing expansion, coupled with the integration of technological advancements, will be closely monitored to assess their impact on operational efficiency and risk management effectiveness.

Profile
Structure

Agahe Pakistan (“The Institution”) was incorporated with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan on January 22, 2016, under Section 42 of the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984. The Institution is licensed to carry out Investment Finance Services as an NBFC under Rule 5 of the Non-Banking Finance Companies Rules, 2003.


Background

The Institution has sprung from AGAHE Society, which was established in 2010. Following Regulatory Compulsion to register Microfinance activities under NBFC License, the Society named “Association for Gender Awareness and Human Empowerment” (AGAHE) spun-off its microfinance operations and transferred its assets, liabilities and equity relating to microfinance operations to Agahe Pakistan on the basis of master agreement with Agahe Pakistan – A Non-Bank Microfinance Company registered u/s 42 of the Companies Act, 2017.


Operations

The Institution operates in 14 districts of Province of Punjab including Vehari, Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar, Rajanpur, Muzaffargarh, Multan, Rajanpur, Layyah, Raheem Yar Khan, Khanewal, Pakpattan, Okara, Sahiwal, Lahore and Kasur. The Institution has diversified product base comprises of General Business, Livestock, Micro-Enterprise, Solar, Auto, Educational, Interest free loans, Islamic Financing, and House Loans. The Institution's portfolio is diversified across various sectors, majorly concentrated in Agri & Livestock, Trade and Services accounting for 27.64%, 29.1% and 42%.55 of the total GLP, respectively.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Agahe Pakistan is a public unlisted Institution limited by Guarantee not having a share capital. The control of the Institution currently vests with 7 members. Members do not have any shareholding in the Institution but have provided a guarantee of a certain amount as required in the regulations.


Stability

All members of the Board bring substantial professional experience and possess in-depth knowledge relevant to the microfinance and development finance sectors. Their diverse expertise contributes meaningfully to strategic decision-making, governance oversight, and the overall growth and sustainability of the Institution.


Business Acumen

The Board comprises highly experienced professionals equipped with the necessary skills and strategic insight to effectively guide the Institution's direction. Dr. Abid Aman Barki, the Chairman, is an expert in economic affairs, bringing over 43 years of extensive industry experience across various leadership roles. His deep understanding of the sector significantly contributes to the Institution’s strategic vision and governance.


Financial Strength

The likelihood of the Institution receiving financial support from its members is limited, given its registration as a not-for-profit organization under section 42 of the Companies Ordinance 1984 (now Companies Act, 2017). This status restricts the Institution's ability to solicit direct financial contributions from members. However, the Institution 's robust financial management practices, diversified revenue streams, and strategic approach have reinforced its financial stability.


Governance
Board Structure

The overall governance of the Institution rests with a seven-member highly qualified and experience Board of Directors (BOD), which includes three independent directors and ensures gender diversity through female representation. The board is supported by three specialized sub-committees: (i) Audit Committee, (ii) Human Resource Committee, and (iii) Risk Management Committee, which provide focused oversight and expert guidance in their respective domains. Meeting attendance has been satisfactory, demonstrating the members' commitment. Additionally, the minutes are thoroughly documented, ensuring transparency and accountability in all board activities.


Members’ Profile

The Board members of the Institution bring a wealth of experience across diverse sectors, contributing to strong governance and strategic oversight. The Chairman, Dr. Abid Aman Barki, has an extensive 43-year career and actively serves on several high-level government committees and task forces, further enhancing the Board’s depth of expertise and policy insight.


Board Effectiveness

The presence of three independent directors enhances the Board's ability to provide objective oversight and informed analysis of strategic decisions, thereby strengthening the Institution's overall governance framework. During FY24, multiple Board meetings were convened to ensure active engagement in key policy and operational matters.


Transparency

Ilyas Saeed & Co., Chartered Accountants ( SBP A- Category firm), serve as the External Auditors of the Institution. For FY24, they issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, affirming the accuracy and reliability of the Institution 's financial reporting. An Internal Audit Department is in place, which reports directly to the Audit Committee, further strengthens the Institution 's commitment to transparency and accountability. Additionally, a dedicated Risk and Compliance Department ensures adherence to regulatory requirements and internal policies and reports to Board Risk Management Committee.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Institution’s operations are structured across seven key departments: (i) Institutional Development, (ii) Operations, (iii) Accounts & Finance, (iv) Risk & Compliance, (v) Internal Audit, (vi) Administration, and (vii) Information Technology. Each department is led by a seasoned professional who reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). In alignment with best governance practices, the Head of Internal Audit and Head Of Risk & Compliance maintains functional independence by reporting directly to the Board Audit and Risk Committees.


Management Team

The senior management team brings extensive experience and deep expertise to the sector. The Chairperson, Dr. Abid Aman Burki, a renowned economist, serves as Professor of Economics at LUMS University, Lahore. The CEO, Mr. Barak Ullah, has nearly two decades of experience in the field. The CFO, Mr. Muhammad Khalid, ACA, a seasoned Chartered Accountant and Associate Member of ICAP, has been with Agahe Pakistan since 2018, with over 13 years of diverse experience. This accomplished leadership is backed by a team of skilled professionals, ensuring strong management and operational excellence.


Effectiveness

The Institution has established various formal management committees for overseeing critical operational areas, performance monitoring and ensuring adherence to policies and procedures. Each department head is responsible for ensuring the smooth functioning of their respective departments and reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer on pertinent matters.


MIS

The Institution is currently undergoing a transformation phase, which includes the digitalization of core processes, the implementation of an advanced Management Information System (MIS).


Risk Management framework

The Institution has adopted a robust risk management framework to effectively address operational, liquidity, and credit risks. Its loan approval process is fully digitized and decentralized, facilitating efficient decision-making.


Technology Infrastructure

Agahe Pakistan currently utilizes an advanced Loan Management System developed by Munsalik Digital Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of PMN. The Institution has been continuously investing in its technological infrastructure to boost automation and efficiency across departments, addressing a vital need in the evolving microfinance sector.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s economy has previously contended with significant macroeconomic headwinds; however, signs of stabilization have emerged in the first half of FY25. This period has been characterized by a gradual reduction in policy rates and a notable decline in inflation, creating a more favorable environment for economic activity. These positive developments are expected to offer crucial support to several sectors, including microfinance. As of the latest data, the total Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) of the microfinance sector stands at approximately ~PKR 598bln, comprising contributions from Microfinance Banks (MFBs), Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), and Rural Support Programs (RSPs). MFIs and RSPs collectively account for around ~23% of the total GLP. In calendar year 2024 (CY24), the number of active borrowers under MFIs and RSPs recorded a modest growth of approximately ~1.17%. Concurrently, the average loan size increased to ~PKR 44,762, up from ~PKR 38,777 in CY23. Portfolio quality also demonstrated improvement, with the infection ratio declining to ~1.57% in CY24, compared to ~2.80% in the previous year.


Relative Position

Agahe Pakistan entered the microfinance sector in 2016, operating across 14 districts in province of Punjab with a network of 44 branches. As of 9MFY25, the Institution’s Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) reached ~PKR 2.37bln, reflecting continued growth. It held a ~0.4% market share in terms of GLP as of end-June 2024, when the portfolio stood at ~PKR 1.95bln, compared to ~PKR 1.65bln at end-June 2023.


Revenue

The Institution recorded an interest income of approximately PKR 894.19 million in FY24, a significant rise from PKR 619.16 million in FY23, driven primarily by higher returns on loans and investments. For the first nine months of FY25, as of March 2025, the Institution recorded an interest income of PKR 811.74 million, largely due to markup earned on advances, totaling about PKR 740.74 million.


Profitability

Agahe Pakistan reported a profit after tax of ~PKR 174mln during 9MFY25, surpassing the full-year profit of ~PKR 145mln in FY24 and significantly higher than ~PKR 67mln in FY23. Profit before provisioning also increased to ~PKR 197mln in 9MFY25, compared to ~PKR 150mln in FY24 and ~PKR 75mln in FY23, indicating sustained growth in core earnings.


Sustainability

The Institution remains committed to advancing financial inclusion, with a strategic focus on underserved rural communities in Punjab. Concurrently, efforts are underway to diversify funding sources through the development of new partnerships and the exploration of alternative financial channels, aimed at strengthening long-term sustainability and operational resilience.


Financial Risk
Credit Risk

As of 9MFY25, the Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) stood at ~PKR 2.37bln, reflecting a growth of ~21.4% compared to FY24. Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) saw a slight increase, reaching ~PKR 31mln in 9MFY25, up from ~PKR 20mln in FY24, and ~PKR 34mln in FY23. Despite this modest increase, asset quality remains stable, underpinned by appropriate provisioning and consistent portfolio quality indicators.


Market Risk

Institution does not maintain an investment portfolio, effectively minimizing its exposure to market risks associated with fluctuations in investment returns or changes in valuations.


Funding

The Institution has diverse borrowing avenues, including the Pakistan Microfinance Investment Company (PMIC), State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), National Bank of Pakistan (NBP), Habib Bank Limited (HBL), The Bank of Punjab (BOP), and JS Bank, which strengthens its funding base. Borrowings increased to ~PKR 2.16bln by 9MFY25, up from ~PKR 1.66bln in FY24 and PKR 1.43bln in FY23, marking a ~14.2% growth in FY24 and further expansion during the current year.


Cashflows & Coverages

Agahe Pakistan maintains a sound liquidity position, with cash and cash equivalents of PKR 615.77mln in 9MFY25. The current ratio was 2.8x in FY23, slightly down from 3.1x in FY22, indicating adequate short-term financial coverages.


Capital Adequacy

As an NBFI under SECP regulation, Agahe Pakistan is not subject to CAR requirements. However, total reserves and funds increased to ~PKR 1.11bln by 9MFY25, up from ~PKR 932mln in FY24 and ~PKR 807mln in FY23. The equity-to-assets ratio stood at ~32.0% in 9MFY25, showing a gradual decline from ~33.2% in FY24 and ~34.4% in FY23, yet remaining healthy and well-aligned with risk exposure.


 
 

Apr-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
Audited Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Total Finances - net 2,366 1,954 1,646 1,641
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Other Earning Assets 875 585 534 219
4. Non-Earning Assets 213 256 196 196
5. Non-Performing Finances-net 8 10 (32) (33)
Total Assets 3,462 2,805 2,344 2,022
6. Deposits 0 0 0 0
7. Borrowings 2,164 1,666 1,438 1,165
8. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 191 208 98 64
Total Liabilities 2,356 1,874 1,537 1,229
Equity 1,106 932 807 793
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Mark Up Earned 847 894 619 420
2. Mark Up Expensed (243) (372) (239) (131)
3. Non Mark Up Income (42) 72 68 75
Total Income 563 594 448 364
4. Non-Mark Up Expenses (366) (445) (373) (288)
5. Provisions/Write offs/Reversals (22) (4) (7) (25)
Pre-Tax Profit 174 145 67 52
6. Taxes 0 0 0 0
Profit After Tax 174 145 67 52
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
Portfolio Yield 45.2% 43.3% 34.1% 23.3%
Minimum Lending Rate 38.5% 44.9% 37.0% 26.3%
Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS) 127.6% 110.5% 100.3% 96.4%
Return on Equity 22.8% 16.7% 8.4% 6.5%
Cost per Borrower Ratio 8,093.7 7,953.8 6,698.8 5,165.7
2. Capital Adequacy
Net NPL/Equity 0.8% 1.1% -4.0% -4.2%
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 32.0% 33.2% 34.4% 39.2%
Tier I Capital / Risk Weighted Assets N/A N/A N/A N/A
Capital Adequacy Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A
Capital Formation Rate [(Profit After Tax - Cash Dividend ) / Equity] 24.9% 18.0% 8.5% N/A
3. Funding & Liquidity
Liquid Assets as a % of Deposits & Short term Borrowings N/A N/A N/A N/A
Demand Deposit Coverage Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A
Liquid Assets/Top 20 Depositors N/A N/A N/A N/A
Funding Diversification (Deposits/(Deposits+Borrowings+Grants)) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Net Advances to Deposits Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A
4. Credit Risk
Top 20 Advances / Advances 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PAR 30 Ratio 1.3% 1.0% 2.0% 1.7%
Write Off Ratio 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
True Infection Ratio 1.3% 1.0% 2.0% 1.7%
Risk Coverage Ratio (PAR 30) 272.0% 262.0% 195.4% 215.3%

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-25

www.pacra.com