Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
28-Mar-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Mar-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
30-Mar-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
31-Mar-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
31-Mar-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Sargodha Jute Mills Limited, established in 1981, operates as an unquoted public limited company in Pakistan. The majority ownership of ~75% is held by Mr. Parvez Aslam and his family, including his two sons, Mr. Imran Aslam (Chairman) and Mr. Irfan Aslam (CEO), each holding a 28.32% stake. The Company’s shares of ~24.94% are owned by its associated entity, Shahzad Textile Mills Limited. Beginning operations in 1984 with an annual production capacity of 5,000 metric tons (MT), the Company has progressively expanded its capacity to around 30,500 MT over the years.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect Sargodha Jute Mills Limited’s (“the Company” or “SJML”) established position within Pakistan’s jute industry, underpinned by its significant market share and a legacy spanning more than four decades. The Company’s principal operations focus on the production and sale of jute products, including sacking bags, hessian cloth, hessian bags, yarn, and twines. Pakistan's jute industry depends entirely on imported raw materials, sourcing 100% of its supply from Bangladesh due to the superior quality and cost-efficiency of Bangladeshi jute. Recently, raw jute prices in Bangladesh have surged, primarily driven by heightened demand from India, which has escalated production costs and increased global market competition. As a result, SJML experienced a notable dip in its export segment during FY24. The top line of the Company has recorded a decline of ~36.4% YoY in FY24, primarily attributable to a significant decrease in demand for jute bags from the government, its key customer, driven by reduced wheat procurement during the year. This decline follows the previous year’s substantial government procurement of jute bags to store imported wheat, which resulted in a surplus of jute bags currently available in the market. During the year, the Company effectively passed on a significant portion of the cost escalation to its customers and improved its profitability margins compared to the previous year. To mitigate the impact on its topline, management implemented cost-effective strategies and transitioned to renewable energy resources through the installation of 2.2 MW solar system, resulting in margin improvement in future. Going forward, the Company remains committed to driving cost efficiencies while actively exploring downstream products beyond jute bags, as well as innovative offerings, to strengthen its position and competitiveness in the export market. The ownership and board structure are primarily composed of members from the sponsoring family, all of whom bring substantial expertise and deep industry-specific experience. The financial risk profile of the Company is deemed adequate, supported by comfortable coverages, adequate cashflows, and a stretched working capital cycle. Capital structure remains low-leveraged, where borrowings are comprised of only short term to meet their working capital needs owing to the seasonal nature of the business.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the firm’s ability to maintain its market position in the face of challenging industry dynamics. Meanwhile, better financial profile through effective working capital management and robust coverages will remain critical. Further enhancing the governance framework for better oversight of strategic affairs is also essential.

Profile
Legal Structure

Sargodha Jute Mills Limited (hereafter referred to as “Sargodha Jute” or “the Company”) was established on February 10, 1981, as an unlisted Public Limited Company under the provisions of the repealed Companies Act, 1913 (now replaced by the Companies Act, 2017). The Company’s registered office is located at 19-B, Off Zafar Ali Road, Gulberg-V, Lahore, while its regional office is located at 309 Uni Tower, 3rd Floor, I.I. Chundrigar Road, Karachi.


Background

The Company was founded in 1981 by the late Mian Muhammad Aslam. The group operates one jute mill and one textile mill. Following the founder's tenure, the operations of Sargodha Jute were entrusted to his son, Mian Parvez Aslam. Subsequently, the leadership transitioned to the next generation, with the two sons of Mian Parvez Aslam serving as the Chairman and CEO of the Company.


Operations

The core business activity of the Company revolves around the manufacturing, sale, and distribution of jute products, leveraging efficient machinery to maintain high standards of quality and operational effectiveness. Sargodha Jute Mills Limited offers a diverse product portfolio, which includes yarn, hessian cloth, hessian bags, sacking bags, and twines. Additionally, the Government of Pakistan is a key contributor to the Company’s revenue through substantial procurement of sacking bags. The Company’s installed production capacity is ~30,500 MT/annum (based on 360 operational days), with a utilization rate of ~38.54% in FY24 (FY23: ~75.07%).


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Mr. Parvez Aslam and his family collectively hold a majority ownership stake of ~75% in the Company. Within this, his sons, Mr. Irfan Aslam and Mr. Imran Aslam, each own a 28.32% share. Additionally, Shahzad Textile Mills Limited, an associated company, holds a 24.94% ownership stake in Sargodha Jute.


Stability

While there is currently no formal succession plan in place, the ownership of shares and business roles is evenly divided between the two sons of Mr. Parvez Aslam, Mr. Imran Aslam and Mr. Irfan Aslam. Mr. Irfan Aslam serves as the CEO of Sargodha Jute Mills Limited, while Mr. Imran Aslam holds the position of CEO at Shahzad Textile Mills Limited. Establishing formal documentation for succession planning could significantly enhance the long-term stability and continuity of the Company.


Business Acumen

Mr. Irfan Aslam, serving as the CEO of Sargodha Jute Mills Limited, brings over two decades of extensive experience in overseeing the Company’s operations. His strong strategic acumen and ability to make timely, effective decisions have been instrumental in steering the Company towards sustained growth and stability.


Financial Strength

Mr. Irfan Aslam holds a 24.85% ownership stake in the associated company, Shahzad Textile Mills Limited, which boasts a robust asset base of ~PKR 5.9bln as of Jun’24. In addition to his business interests, Mr. Irfan Aslam demonstrates a strong financial acumen through active investments in diverse sectors, including real estate, the stock market, and foreign exchange markets. The Company is expected to get timely support from its sponsors, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's board comprises three members, two of whom belong to the sponsoring family. Mr. Irfan, serving as the CEO, and Mr. Ahsan, acting as the COO, hold executive director positions. Meanwhile, Mr. Imran, who chairs the board, serves as a non-executive director. The compact size of the board, with key leadership roles primarily held within the sponsoring family, reflects a concentrated and efficient decision-making approach. However, an independent oversight could enhance the governance structure, fostering greater transparency and balance in strategic decision-making.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Irfan Aslam, a graduate of a prestigious foreign university, brings over two decades of expertise in the jute industry and currently serves as the CEO of Sargodha Jute Mills Limited. While Mr. Imran Aslam, with a strong foothold in the textile sector, holds the position of CEO at Shahzad Textile Mills Limited. Their extensive experience and leadership have been pivotal in driving the Company’s growth and sustainability.


Board Effectiveness

The board’s overall effectiveness is hindered by its limited size and the significant influence of the sponsoring family, which may affect diverse and balanced decision-making. Additionally, the practice of board meetings held on an “as and when needed” basis reduces the opportunity for structured and regular oversight. Furthermore, the lack of independent directors and the absence of specialized board committees limit the board’s ability to provide robust governance and strategic guidance.


Financial Transparency

Crowe Hussain Chaudhry & Co., Chartered Accountants, a QCR-rated firm and listed in the category ‘A’ on SBP’s panel of auditors, serve as the Company’s external auditors. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the annual financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2024.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational framework is structured into two primary divisions: the Head Office and the Mills. All key positions within the organization are filled. Major functional departments include, (i) Accounts & Finance, (ii) Procurement, and (iii) Production. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) directly reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), establishing a clear financial oversight hierarchy. Meanwhile, the Purchase Manager and Manager Commercial from the Head Office, along with the Mill Managers, report to the Chief Operating Officer (COO), fostering streamlined coordination between the operational and managerial divisions.


Chart 1: Organizational Structure
Management Team

Mr. Irfan Aslam, the CEO, is a graduate of a reputed foreign university and brings over two decades of extensive experience in the jute industry. He holds the authority to make strategic decisions for the Company, ensuring its continued growth and success. Supporting him is Mr. Imran Haider, the CFO, who has been associated with the group for nine years and has served in his current role for one year. Mr. Ahsan Ahmad Khan, the COO, has dedicated 29 years to Sargodha Jute Mills Limited and possesses a wealth of experience in the jute industry and oversees day-to-day operations. Another key team member is Mr. Ayyaz Ali Shahid, the Manager Commercial, who has been with the Company for the past seven years. He specializes in raw jute procurement from Bangladesh, a critical component of the Company’s supply chain. Additionally, the finance department is primarily headed by Mr. Tahir, the General Manager of Finance, who ensures effective financial management and oversight within the organization.


Effectiveness

With the support of a highly skilled and experienced team of professionals, Sargodha Jute continues to enhance its business capabilities. The management functions are well-defined and supported by a strong IT infrastructure and comprehensive internal controls, enabling effective operational oversight and decision-making. However, the lack of management committees and internal audit function limits the ability to ensure seamless communication and coordination across various functions.


MIS

Sargodha Jute Mills uses oracle-based ERP system by the name of Wizmen. Regular reporting of sales figures, raw materials positions, payables & receivables and income statement on monthly basis is shared with top management. Secondly, the Company uses Kaspersky registered antivirus software to protect the data of the Company. On the other hand, data from the production facility is shared on real-time basis because point to point link has been developed between the mill and head office.


Control Environment

The Company is ISO 9001-2015 certified, reflecting its adherence to internationally recognized quality management standards. A dedicated quality control department ensures the consistent delivery of high-quality products to customers. Additionally, the Company has implemented an efficient system for addressing customer complaints and providing prompt resolutions, further enhancing customer satisfaction. However, the establishment of an internal audit function could strengthen transparency and reinforce internal controls, contributing to a more robust governance framework.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s economy is facing serious challenges such as uncertain economic conditions, high energy costs, high interest rates and inflation. These factors present a serious challenge for a business; by increasing costs on one hand and by decreasing consumers’ buying power on the other hand. In the coming year, further reduction in interest rates is expected, however, economic recovery is also expected to remain slow in coming year. During FY24, the domestic market capitalization of the Jute Sector was valued at ~PKR 33.5bln, marking a substantial year-on-year (YoY) growth of ~18.8% compared to PKR 28.2bln in the previous year. From FY19 to FY23, the average production levels of jute goods were ~65,000 metric tons (MT). However, in FY24, total jute goods production witnessed a sharp decline of ~35.0%, dropping to ~41,000 MT from ~63,000 MT in FY23. Among the various product categories, sacking bags maintained their leading position, contributing ~65.9% to the total production in FY24, with output recorded at ~26,500 MT, representing a YoY decrease of ~43.8%. Other product categories, such as Hessian Cloth and Miscellaneous Products, accounted for ~26.8% and ~7.3% of the total production, respectively, during FY24. Likewise, the production utilization of the sector’s key players declined in the current year. The installed production capacity of the five major players in the local Jute Mills Sector remained unchanged and stood at ~114,300 MT in FY24. Notably, Thal Limited and Sargodha Jute Mills collectively dominated the market, holding a combined share of ~75% of the sector’s total production capacity.


Relative Position

The jute industry in Pakistan comprises only a few key players, creating a concentrated competitive landscape. Sargodha Jute ranks as one of the two largest players in the sector, boasting an annual installed production capacity of 30,500 MT. As per the management, the Company holds a market share of ~40%. Thal Jute Mills, the largest competitor, holds a slightly higher market share, supported by its marginally larger installed capacity of 33,800 MT. The remaining market share is distributed among smaller players, including White Pearl Jute Mills, Indus Jute, and Madina Jute, each contributing a relatively modest portion to the industry landscape.


Revenues

Sargodha Jute Mills Limited’s turnover faced significant pressure in FY24, as revenue contracted by ~36.4% to ~PKR 5,162mln, down from ~PKR 8,113mln in FY23. This marked deterioration stemmed from various factors. Export sales witnessed a sharp decline of ~46.5%, primarily driven by elevated production costs, which eroded the competitiveness of the Company in global markets. Domestically, the prior year benefitted from an unusually high level of jute bag procurement by the government, a demand surge that was not sustained in FY24.


Graph 1: Revenue & Margins
Margins

During FY24, the Company demonstrated a notable improvement in profitability metrics. The gross margin increased to ~16.7% (FY23: ~12.9%, FY22: ~13%), primarily driven by enhanced cost efficiencies. Similarly, the operating margin improved to ~12.1% in FY24, up from 9.3% in FY23 (FY22: ~9.2%), reflecting better operational performance. Furthermore, the net profit margin recorded a significant rise, reaching ~5.2% in FY24 (FY23: ~2.2%, FY22: ~4.6%). This substantial increase was largely attributable to a rise in other income, showcasing the Company’s ability to improve and sustain its bottom line despite external challenges.


Sustainability

The Company remains proactive in addressing the challenges by implementing strategic measures to mitigate adverse impacts. To reduce escalating energy costs, the Company is actively investing in renewable energy solutions. An extension of 420 KW was completed after June 2024, with a further expansion of 1,500 KW underway and expected to become operational by April 2025. This will bring the total solar energy capacity at the mills to 2.2 MW, demonstrating the Company’s commitment to sustainability and cost efficiency. Jute bags remain the Company’s flagship product, valued for their environmentally friendly and biodegradable properties. With growing social awareness and a global shift towards eco-friendly products, jute bags are well-positioned to become the preferred choice among consumers, further enhancing the Company’s market appeal and long-term sustainability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During FY24, the Company’s gross working capital days rose to 139 days (FY23: ~94 days, FY22:  ~91 days), reflecting an extension of the cash cycle. Similarly, net working capital days increased to 134 days in FY24 (FY23: ~92 days, FY22: ~16 days). This decline was primarily attributable to elevated inventory levels, driven by the unusually high procurement of jute bags by the government in the preceding year and the subsequent carryover of inventory disturbed the Company’s cash conversion cycle.


Graph 2: Working Capital Cycle
Coverages

During FY24, free cash flows from operations also remained the same at ~PKR 621mln (FY23: ~PKR 658mln, FY22: ~PKR 492mln). Interest coverage ratio is slightly under stress mainly on the back of a significant surge in finance costs which stood at ~PKR 323mln in FY24 (FY23: ~PKR 327mln, FY22: ~PKR 173mln). Company’s investment portfolio consists of ~PKR 426mln TDRs and ~PKR 276mln listed equity security investments.


Graph 3: Financial Coverages
Capitalization

The Company has gradually reduced its borrowings and increased its equity on the back of revaluation of assets resulting in a reduced leverage of 10.0% in FY24 (FY23: 20.9%, FY22: 32.3%). Total borrowings of the Company decreased to ~PKR 410mln (FY23: PKR 909mln, FY22: PKR 1,260mln). The debt portfolio solely comprises short-term borrowings to meet the working capital needs of the Company.


Graph 4: Capital Structure
 
 

Mar-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,191 2,287 1,423
2. Investments 702 511 545
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,650 2,849 2,919
a. Inventories 1,095 1,200 1,342
b. Trade Receivables 770 869 751
5. Total Assets 5,543 5,647 4,888
6. Current Liabilities 1,003 880 827
a. Trade Payables 87 51 33
7. Borrowings 410 909 1,260
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 454 414 162
10. Net Assets 3,676 3,443 2,639
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,676 3,443 2,639
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,162 8,113 6,516
a. Cost of Good Sold (4,300) (7,063) (5,669)
2. Gross Profit 862 1,050 847
a. Operating Expenses (239) (300) (250)
3. Operating Profit 623 751 598
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 97 (76) 37
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 720 675 634
a. Total Finance Cost (323) (327) (173)
b. Taxation (129) (171) (163)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 269 178 298
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 621 658 492
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 295 325 343
c. Changes in Working Capital 410 33 (804)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 705 358 (461)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (107) (119) 102
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (499) (350) 470
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 99 (111) 111
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -36.4% 24.5% 42.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 16.7% 12.9% 13.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 5.2% 2.2% 4.6%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 20.0% 8.5% -4.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 7.5% 5.8% 11.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 139 94 91
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 134 92 89
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.6 3.2 3.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.7 3.0 4.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.1 2.2 2.4
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.1
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 10.0% 20.9% 32.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 27.0 30.3 67.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 26.7% 19.8% 15.8%

Mar-25

www.pacra.com

Mar-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-25

www.pacra.com