Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
14-Feb-25 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
16-Feb-24 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
20-Feb-23 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
21-Feb-22 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Aug-21 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Sindh Abadgars was incorporated in 1984 as a public listed company and was formerly owned by Effendi Group. The primary business activity of the Company involves manufacturing and sale sugar, along with its by-products. In 2005, Essarani Family acquired the Company. Today, major shareholding of the Company rests with Essarani Family (~79%). The remaining shareholding resides with Islamic Developmental Bank (~9%), insurance companies (~2.4%). Whereas, ~10% stake is held by the general public. Dr. Tara Chand heads the Company as the Chief Executive Officer.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings affirm Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills Ltd. ('Sindh Abadgars' or 'the Company') as an established player in Pakistan’s sugar industry. A key contributing factor to the ratings is Sindh Abadgars’ affiliation with the well-established United Group, which holds a prominent presence in the country's sugar and related industries. The group also reflects adequate market share in sugar industry stemming from the support of sugar mills (SGM Sugar Mills and Sindh Abadgar Sugar Mills). The market risk the Company may face includes fluctuations in sugarcane yields and quality, influenced by agronomic conditions and cyclical variations in crop production. Additionally, raw material price volatility further accentuates operational uncertainty, necessitating adept supply chain, and cost management. This, in turn, impacts profit margins, leading to net losses. Due to the surplus stocks, the government has allowed the sugar millers to export ~0.79 million MT, ensuring liquidity relief for the industry. With the government's shift to deregulated pricing of sugarcane, the cost of goods sold is expected to decline moving forward, as prices are determined by market forces rather than fixed regulations. This transition to a market-driven pricing model will likely lead to more competitive pricing, encouraging efficiency and cost reduction across industries. However, this shift may introduce risks that could discourage farmers from cultivating sugarcane. On the financial profile side, Sindh Abadgar derives its revenue from sugar (~96% local market and ~4% export market). During MY24, the Company’s topline has reflected a slight incline of ~4% YoY, primarily due to increased sugar prices despite a decline in sales volume. Sugar exports also provided a cushion in sustaining the growth. Profitability metrics showed an eroding performance, as gross margins declined due to high procurement cost of sugarcane. Similarly, the operating margin also mirrored the same effect and decline resulting from high operating expenses. Meanwhile, net margins were also compressed as a result of a net loss driven by increased financing expenses in the context of a high-interest-rate environment. On the other side, leverage indicators continue to remain moderate on account of the utilization of short-term borrowing. Governance and management continue to be critical strengths for the Company. Anchored by the Essarani family’s strategic oversight, the leadership team leverages decades of expertise to steer the Company through evolving industry dynamics.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon improving margins and strict working capital discipline. The Company’s ability to improve profitability while further strengthening coverage ratios remains critical. Any significant deterioration in business performance and/or financial health will negatively impact ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills Limited (referred to as "SASML" or "the Company") is a publicly listed entity on the Pakistan Stock Exchange.


Background

The Company was founded in Karachi, Pakistan, on January 28, 1984, under the ownership of the Effendi Group. In 2005, the Essarani Family took over and has since been in charge of its operations and management.


Operations

The Company is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and sale of white refined crystal sugar, along with by-products such as bagasse (used for energy generation and as a raw material for various industries) and molasses (used in the production of ethanol). The Company’s sugar mill boasts an impressive annual crushing capacity of 8,000 metric tons (MT) per day. In terms of production performance, Sindh Abadgars recorded sugar production of 56,855 MT during the fiscal year MY24. This marks an increase of ~10.3% compared to the 51,529 MT produced in MY23, demonstrating a steady improvement in operational efficiency and output. The mill’s capacity utilization remained at ~77% during MY24. The Company operated for 85 crushing days during the year, which is indicative of an efficient operational period. Additionally, the sugar recovery rate, which measures the amount of sugar extracted from the sugar cane, increased by ~0.45%, from ~10.63% in MY23 to ~10.90% in MY24. This improvement in recovery rate can largely be attributed to favorable moisture content in the sugar cane crop, which enhances the efficiency of the extraction process and leads to a higher yield of sugar from the raw material. The mill is located in Tando Mohammed Khan, Sindh.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Essarani Family holds the majority ownership of Sindh Abadgars, owning ~79% of the total shares. Insurance companies collectively hold around ~2% of the ownership, while foreign investors, with the Islamic Development Bank being a prominent participant, hold about ~9%. The general public holds the remaining ~10% of the Company's shares.


Stability

Given the current ownership distribution and the strong family involvement, it is unlikely that significant changes will occur in the near future. The family's control of the majority of shares and the absence of outside investors suggest that the enterprise is positioned for continuity. This stability provides a solid foundation for maintaining long-term operations and can also foster trust with stakeholders, including employees, customers, and business partners, who value consistency in leadership and direction. Although there is no formalized succession planning documenting the roles of family members within the company are clearly defined.


Business Acumen

The Essarani family brings a wealth of experience in the agricultural sector, operating under the umbrella of the 'United Group.' The group's diversified portfolio spans multiple industries, with key assets including sugar mill—Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills . Additionally, the family’s holdings extend to United Ethanol Industries Limited, a major player in ethanol production, as well as Agro Trade Private Limited, United AgroChemicals and, Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited which further strengthen the group's presence in the agriculturaland chemical industries.


Financial Strength

The company maintains robust financial stability attributed to the support of its group and sponsors. As of the MY23, the group's total assets amounted to ~PKR 29bln, backed by an equity base of around PKR 13.2bln. During this period, the group achieved a net profit of ~PKR 1,682mln. The group maintains a moderate level of leverage.This stable financial position the Company for continued growth and resilience in the face of market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills Limited (SASML) is constituted of 10 members in total, with a diverse mix of roles. Among them, there are 5 Non-executive directors, 2 Executive directors, and 3 Independent directors. The board is comprised of 9 Male members and 1 female representative on the Board. Additionally, the Board is predominantly influenced by the sponsoring family, holding a significant majority with seven members from the family.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Deoo Mal Esraani, Chairman of the Board, also chairs SGM Sugar Mills Limited and United Ethanol Industries Limited. Mr. Deoo Mal has over 47 years of experience, he assumed the chairmanship role. The Board comprises three independent directors: Mr. Zafar Ahmed Ghori, Mr. M. Siddiq Khokhar, and Ms. Maheshwari Osha.


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors of the company has established two key sub-committees to ensure effective governance and oversight. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the financial reporting process, ensuring the accuracy and integrity of financial statements, reviewing internal controls, and monitoring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The HR & Remuneration Committee, on the other hand, focuses on the company’s human resources strategy, including talent management, executive compensation, and organizational development, ensuring that HR practices are aligned with the company’s objectives and compliant with relevant laws. Together, these committees play a crucial role in promoting transparency, accountability, and strategic alignment within the organization.


Financial Transparency

The Company's auditors, M/s Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq, issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for MY24. The firm come under category 'A' as designated by the SBP.


Management
Organizational Structure

The organizational structure is divided in two segments: Mill operations overseen by the resident director and Head-Office administration managed by the Group CFO. Both heads report directly to the CEO. Specialized departments include Administration & Sales, Finance & Tax, Purchase, and Corporate Affairs, all reporting to the CFO, who reports directly to the CEO.


Management Team

Dr. Tara Chand, the CEO, brings over 16 years of expertise in the sugar and allied industries. In addition to his role as CEO of the Company, Dr. Chand also serves as the CEO of United Ethanol Industries. He is supported by a skilled leadership team, including Mr. Abdul Rahim Mallah (Resident Director Mills), and Mr. Saqib Ghaffar (Group Director Finance). Together, they provide strong leadership and direction for the Company. All the senior management team comprises seasoned professionals with significant expertise in the Sugar Industry.


Effectiveness

The Company currently does not have formally established management committees. However, the managementteam engages in regular performance discussions to assess and review ongoing activities. These discussions allowthe leadership to evaluate the progress of various initiatives, address challenges, and ensure alignment with theCompany’s strategic goals.


MIS

The Company has implemented Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software from Cosmosoft to streamline its operations and enhance efficiency. This software helps integrate various business processes, providing a centralized system for managing key functions such as inventory, production, finance, and human resources.


Control Environment

The internal audit function is currently centralized at the group level. Going forward, the group plans to enhance its control environment by expanding the internal audit team, adding more personnel to oversight and improve theeffectiveness of internal controls across the organization.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately 90 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. Despite its scale, the industry faces persistent challenges, particularly due to the Government-regulated sugarcane support prices, which are set based on farmer’s costs and often constrain millers' profitability. In MY23, sugar production declined by approximately 15%, reaching 6.7million MT, primarily due to the devastating floods that damaged standing crops and reduced the recovery rate. To manage the surplus inventory, the Government permitted the export of 0.5 million MT of sugar, offering some relief to the industry. The current MY24 season also reflects the lingering effects of flash floods, with a 4.7% loss in cultivated area. Despite these setbacks, sugar production is estimated to recover slightly to around 7 million MT. The Government’s continued support for exports is expected to provide a much-needed boost to millers, helping them navigate challenging industry dynamics and mitigate financial pressures.


Relative Position

The Company contributed approximately ~0.9% to the total production of sugar produced in Pakistan


Revenues

The primary source of the Company's revenue is derived from the sale of refined sugar. A geographical split of revenue indicates that ~96.4% is generated from the local market, while the remaining ~3.5% originates from exports. During MY24, the Company's topline increased by ~4.1%, reporting to PKR 5.7 billion compared to PKR 5.5 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year MY23. This growth was driven by an increase in the sale price per kg, which rose from PKR 91/kg in MY23 to PKR 112/kg in MY24, despite a decline in sales volume, which decreased from 61,141 M/tons to 51,571 M/tons. Looking ahead, revenue stability is anticipated, underpinned by resilient local market demand for sugar. Additionally, the Company's financial performance improved due to sugar exports, amounting to PKR 205mln, which contributed positively to its results.


Margins

The Company's profitability margins reflect a deteriorated performance during MY24. Gross profit margin fell sharply to ~4.9% (MY23: ~20.5%), This steep decline was primarily driven by a substantial increase in the procurement cost of sugarcane, which had a direct negative impact on the cost of production. Higher sugarcane costs reduced the overall margin from the core business operations, making it more difficult to sustain profitability at the same levels as in the previous year. This translated into shrink Operating profit margin (~2%, down from ~17.7%). Moreover, during MY24 net profit margin contracted to -5.2% from ~6.7%. This decline is primarily attributed to a substantial net loss, occurred in 9MMY24 and MY24. Additionally, decline is primarily attributed to a substantial increase in finance costs, which rose to ~49%, reflecting the impact of elevated borrowing costs in a high-interest-rate environment.


Sustainability

The Company is projected to benefit from higher sugar prices and exports, leading to improved margins. Nevertheless, management should prioritize diversifying the Company's revenue sources.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management has shown increased during MY24. Inventories witnessed a rise, averaging 82 days compared to 71 days in MY23, driven by higher levels of finished goods. This increase reflects extended stockholding periods, which could tie up liquidity and strain cash flows if not managed effectively. Trade receivables remain negligible at 2 days on average, underscoring the Company’s efficient receivables collection practices. However, trade payables averaged 17 days, from 19 days in MY23, indicating improved utilization of supplier credit. Despite this, the Gross Working Capital cycle lengthened to 84 days (MY23: 73 days), resulting in a higher Net Working Capital cycle of 67 days compared to 54 days in the previous period. Going Forward, the working capital cycle is expected to improve due to the efficient selling of stock through export.


Coverages

The Company's coverage indicators reflect a mixed performance during MY24, highlighting challenges in its financial risk profile. The EBITDA-to-Finance Cost ratio has declined to 0.5x (MY23: 3.2x), signaling a reduced capacity to cover finance costs through operational earnings. Similarly, the FCFO-to-Finance Cost ratio has weakened to 0.1x from 3.0x, indicating tighter cash flow coverage of financial obligations. Debt repayment timelines have lengthened due to weaker cash flow generation, highlighting the need for improved financial efficiency. Going forward, coverages are expected to ease resulting due to lower finance cost.


Capitalization

SASML maintains a low leveraged capital structure which is a good sign in comparison to other industry players, with a debt-to-equity ratio standing at ~38.2% in MY24 (MY23: ~23.3%). The Company's debt consists of short-term borrowings only, constituting (100%) of the total debt. In MY24, the total debt of the Company stood to PKR 1,311mln due to increased utilization for running finance for working capital purposes and repayment of loan. The equity base of the Company stood at ~PKR 2,902mln (MY23: ~PKR 2,061mln).


 
 

Feb-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,548 3,018 3,099
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,256 1,372 1,827
a. Inventories 1,753 842 1,322
b. Trade Receivables 68 0 37
5. Total Assets 6,804 4,390 4,926
6. Current Liabilities 951 781 711
a. Trade Payables 251 290 275
7. Borrowings 1,311 146 1,179
8. Related Party Exposure 480 480 480
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,160 922 869
10. Net Assets 2,902 2,061 1,687
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,902 2,061 1,687
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,766 5,535 3,873
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,483) (4,401) (3,581)
2. Gross Profit 284 1,133 292
a. Operating Expenses (171) (151) (129)
3. Operating Profit 113 982 163
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 45 11 103
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 157 993 266
a. Total Finance Cost (573) (384) (280)
b. Taxation 116 (236) (27)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (299) 373 (41)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 39 1,164 385
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (479) 742 141
c. Changes in Working Capital (702) 426 (7)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (1,181) 1,168 134
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (66) (55) (14)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (100) (655) (80)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1,347) 458 40
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 4.2% 42.9% 44.6%
b. Gross Profit Margin 4.9% 20.5% 7.5%
c. Net Profit Margin -5.2% 6.7% -1.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -11.5% 28.7% 9.7%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -12.1% 19.9% -2.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 84 73 116
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 67 54 89
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.4 1.8 2.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 0.5 3.2 1.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.1 2.5 1.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -1.0 0.8 6.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 38.2% 23.3% 49.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 50.5 22.7 80.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 20.9% 17.3% 11.0%

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-25

www.pacra.com