Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
27-Dec-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
28-Dec-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
28-Dec-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
28-Dec-21 A+ A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

HBL Microfinance Bank Limited was incorporated in 2001 as a nationwide microfinance institution and obtained the Microfinance banking license from the State Bank of Pakistan in 2002. The Bank is predominantly owned by HBL with 89.38%, followed by the Aga Khan Agency for Microfinance (AKAM) at 6.37%, the Aga Khan Rural Support Programme (AKRSP) at 2.36%, and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) at 1.89%. HBL, AKAM, and AKRSP operate under the umbrella of the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN).

Rating Rationale

The assigned rating of HBL Microfinance Bank Limited ("HBL MfB" or the "Bank") reflects an adequate financial profile, strengthened by substantial support from its sponsors. Being a subsidiary of the AAA-rated HBL Bank positively supports the assigned rating. HBL MfB stands out as a leading Microfinance Bank, holding one of the largest share of deposit and loan portfolios in the industry. The Bank managed significant challenges during the year. A credit crunch in South Punjab, coupled with an intense wheat price crash, adversely impacted the lending portfolio. Additionally, the adoption of IFRS-9 further strained the Bank's profitability. On the other end, the high-for-long interest rates had escalated the cost of funds leading to spread compression. Delinquencies in the South's agri and livestock portfolio coupled with accelerated provisions due to IFRS-9 added to the pressures. In response, management is taking proactive measures, including capital injection of PKR 6bln in May 2024 and managing the risk-weighted assets by limiting growth in lending. Furthermore, the strategy of reducing the bullet portfolio (from ~50% in CY19 to ~23% in CY24) has now been significantly accelerated, reducing to below 10% within the next 3 years. Sustained and enhanced focus on recovery will be key, through increasing the specialized recovery team. However, to support the CAR going forward, the Bank plans to augment capital further by issue of Additional Tier I and Tier II capital, enhancing its risk absorption capacity and creating room to expand the lending portfolio, while maximizing available capital utilization. The declining interest rate environment is expected to widen the gross spreads and expected recoveries from the delinquent portfolio would further add to the profitability of the Bank.
On financial profile side, at end-Sep24, the Bank's gross advances reported at PKR 94.7bln (end-Dec23: PKR 100.9bln). Non-performing loans rose to PKR 9.5bln (end-Dec23: PKR 2.7bln) concentrated mainly in the agri and livestock bullet portfolio. Consequently, the Bank's overall infection ratio inclined to 10% (end-Dec23: 3%). EMI loans including microenterprise portfolio and housing portfolio is performing satisfactorily. The funding is fueled by deposits, where high contributions arise from savings and term deposits. At end-Sep24, the deposit base of the Bank reported at PKR 118.5bln (end-Dec23: PKR 128.2bln). During 9MCY24, the Net Interest Margin (NIMR) declined to PKR 5.5bln (9MCY23: PKR 7.6bln). Due to high-cost deposits, increased provisioning charges, and slow recoveries in the South Punjab Region, the Bank reported a loss after tax of PKR 4bln (9MCY23: Profit PKR 782mln). At end-Sep24, the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) inclined to 16.1% (end-Dec23: 15.3%) owing to a substantial investment of PKR 6bln by its parent.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings rely on the Bank’s ability to effectively address emerging risks in the current stressed environment while maintaining its business and financial stability. The management’s strategic response to these challenges remains crucial.

Profile
Structure

HBL Microfinance Bank Limited ("HBL MfB" or the "Bank") was incorporated in 2001 as a nationwide microfinance institution and obtained the Microfinance banking license from the State Bank of Pakistan in 2002.

Background

The Bank was founded as a structured transformation of the credit and savings section of the Aga Khan Rural Support Programme (AKRSP), a development initiative pioneering microfinance in Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral since 1982.

Operations

As of end-Sep24, the Bank operates 225 business locations, including branches and permanent booths (end-Dec23: 225), with its head office based in Islamabad. The Bank provides a diverse range of products and services for low-income wage earners and the self-employed, focusing on microlending segments such as Agriculture, Livestock, Micro-enterprise, Housing, Nano Loans, Solar Finance, and more.

Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Bank's ownership is primarily held by HBL with a stake of 89.38%, followed by the Aga Khan Agency for Microfinance (AKAM) at 6.37%, Aga Khan Rural Support Programme (AKRSP) at 2.36%, and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) with 1.89%.

Stability

This ownership structure is expected to remain stable in the near term.

Business Acumen

The Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN), which sponsors HBL, AKAM, and AKRSP, is a group of agencies focused on development in areas such as environment, health, education, architecture, culture, microfinance, rural development, and disaster management. AKDN aims to improve the quality of life for underserved communities, mainly in Asia and Africa, by fostering self-reliance.

Financial Strength

The sponsor's business expertise is considered strong, with HBL, the direct sponsor, recognized as one of Pakistan's largest banks by deposits and advances. At end-Sep24, the HBL's deposit base stood at PKR 4.8tln, with equity at PKR 411bln.

Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors consists of eight members: four representatives from HBL, one from the Aga Khan Agency for Microfinance, one from the Aga Khan Rural Support Programme (AKRSP), and two from the Japan International Cooperation Agency.

Members’ Profile

The Board is chaired by Mr. Rayomond Kotwal, CFO of HBL, who has over 30 years of senior finance experience across various commercial banks. Each Board member brings significant expertise, with a majority possessing extensive banking experience, enhancing the Board's overall strength. Ms. Maya Inayat Ismail brings over 25 years of experience in the financial services sector, with roles at HBL, HBL Microfinance Bank Ltd., and Global Securities Pakistan Ltd. She specializes in monitoring financial institutions, managing strategic partnerships, and strategy formulation. Ms. Ismail holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and International Relations from Smith College, Northampton (USA), and is an Accredited Mediator from the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution, UK. Mr. Abrar Ahmed Mir has over 30 years of experience, having worked with United Bank Limited, Citibank N.A., and ICI Pakistan, among others. He is currently HBL’s Chief Information & Transformation Officer. Mr. Mir holds an MBA from the Illinois Institute of Technology, a BE in Electronics Engineering from the College of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Pakistan, and completed the "Strategic Leadership in Inclusive Finance" course at Harvard Business School. Ms. Sobia Chughtai brings 32 years of diversified experience in the financial sector. Currently serving as Portfolio Head Corporate Risk – Central at HBL, she has previously held key positions at Al Faysal Investment Bank Limited and Fauji Fertilizer Company. She holds an MBA from LUMS and a BSc in Electrical Engineering from UET, Lahore. Mr. Zahir Riaz is a Partner at Orr, Dignam & Co. and leads the Islamabad office. With 42 years of experience, he specializes in corporate law, mergers & acquisitions, banking & finance, capital markets, construction, privatizations, and energy. He holds legal degrees from the London School of Economics, University of Cambridge, and is a qualified Barrister from Gray’s Inn, UK. Ms. Rashna Minwalla has extensive experience in financial securities, derivatives, and equity broking, having worked at Elixir Securities Pakistan, JP Morgan Broking Pakistan, and other firms. She is currently the CEO & Director of The Fertility Clinic in Karachi. Ms. Minwalla holds a Masters in Finance from the London Business School and both a Masters and Bachelor's in Business Administration from the Institute of Business Administration, Karachi. Mr. Tsuyoshi Hara is the Senior Representative for JICA Pakistan, with over 15 years of experience in managing development projects. He has worked at JICA and JBIC, specializing in infrastructure projects such as power, water, sanitation, and public-private partnerships. Mr. Hara holds a Bachelor's degree in Economics from Keio University, a Master's in Economics (specializing in Public-Private Partnerships) from Toyo University, Japan, and is a Ph.D. candidate in Public Policy and Public Administration at Florida State University. Ms. Kate Perkins has 15+ years of experience in the financial services sector. She is currently the Investment Director at British International Investment plc, focusing on equity investments in Africa and South Asia, with a specialization in financial inclusion. Previously, Ms. Perkins worked at Nesta, Citigroup, and EY, where she qualified as a Chartered Accountant. She holds an MPhys degree in Physics from Oxford University.

Board Effectiveness

The Board has six committees: (i) Human Resource Committee, (ii) Risk & Compliance Committee, (iii) Audit Committee, (iv) Information Technology Committee, (v) Financial Inclusion & Sustainability Committee, and (vi) Board Remuneration Committee. In CY23, the Board held four meetings, with satisfactory attendance.

Transparency

KPMG Taser Hadi & Co. serves as the Bank’s external auditor and issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2023. The internal audit department reports directly to the Audit Committee.

Management
Organizational Structure

The Bank operates with a horizontally structured organization, comprising 11 departments that report directly to the Chief Executive Officer. Each reporting line and job description is clearly defined.

Management Team

Mr. Muhammad Amir Khan, the CEO and President, has been with the Bank since 2012 and has 30 years of experience in commercial and consumer banking. He is supported by a skilled and experienced team. Mr. Ali Raza Anjum is the Chief Operating Officer and has been with the Bank since 2012. He brings over 29 years of diverse experience in business, treasury, risk management, compliance, credit, internal audit, banking operations, finance, and human resources, having held senior management positions in prominent commercial and microfinance banks. Mr. Rizwan Maqsood serves as the Chief Financial Officer and also fulfills the roles of Company Secretary and General Counsel. With more than twenty years of extensive experience, he has managed a variety of functions including financial strategy, planning, management, reporting, analysis, accounting, auditing, and assurance. Mr. Junaed Rayaz, the Chief Risk Officer of the Bank, has almost 30 years of diverse experience in the banking industry, focusing on credit and market risk management, fraud prevention, and portfolio optimization.

Effectiveness

The Bank has designated various management committees to manage and oversee operational efficiency.

MIS

The Bank has implemented a robust Management Information System (MIS) infrastructure that features system-generated reports and detailed live dashboards to facilitate effective decision-making.

Risk Management framework

A dedicated risk management department regularly monitors credit, operational, and market risks, convening monthly to ensure adherence to the risk profile approved by the Board of Directors.

Technology Infrastructure

The Bank's IT infrastructure, which supports core banking and other essential systems, is located in a state-of-the-art data center at its Head Office. The Core Banking System (CBS) in use is Oracle's Flexcube, which has been enhanced with features to address changing business needs and stringent regulatory requirements.

Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Microfinance Banking sector (" Sector ") continues to grapple with long-standing challenges in the form of declined asset quality, negative profitability and weakened Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) mainly driven by the historical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in CY20 to the hazard of floods in Jul-Aug'22 followed by the economic slowdown in CY23 along with very high inflation in the past couple of years, the Sector's resilience has been repeatedly tested. During 6MCY24, the deposit base of MFBs increased by 6.7% to stand at PKR 637bln. The GLP of the Sector recorded a marginal uptick of 1.4% to stand at PKR 414bln. Whereas, the infection ratio jumped to 10.5% from 6.7% in CY23. The reported loss of the Sector soared to PKR 12.1bln from PKR 8.1bln in CY23. Consequently, the Sector 's equity base declined to PKR 22.6bln from PKR 37.4bln, resulting in the declined CAR of the Sector clocking in at 5.7% from 7.6% in CY23 falling far below the regulatory threshold of 15%. These factors cumulatively raise serious and persistent concerns about the performance of the Sector. Furthermore, during the year there was a significant credit crunch in South Punjab, coupled with intense wheat price crash, which adversely impacted the lending portfolio in the region.

Relative Position

HBL Microfinance Bank Limited is the leading Bank in the Sector with one of the highest share of deposits and gross loan portfolio (GLP) clocking in at 19% and 23% respectively.

Revenue

In CY23, the Bank's markup income rose by 38.1% to PKR 33.2bln (CY22: PKR 24.1bln 9MCY24: PKR 25.3bln) due to higher earnings from advances and investments. However, markup expenses surged by 65% to PKR 22.5bln (CY22: PKR 13.6bln) because of significant increase in policy rate from average of 13% in CY22 to average of 21% in CY23. Consequently, the Net Interest Margin (NIMR) increased slightly by 3% to PKR 10.7bln.

Profitability

Non-markup income grew 21% to PKR 2.5bln (CY22: PKR 2.1bln), mainly driven by fee and commission income of PKR 2.2bln. The provisioning charges increased to PKR 2.8bln (CY22: PKR 2.5bln). Due to high-cost deposits and administrative expenses, net profitability fell by 66% to PKR 405mln, impacting the CAR, which stood at 15.3% as of end-Dec23. Subsequently, in 9MCY24, the Bank reduced its advances by 6.1% to PKR 94.7bln. The Bank adjusted its funding mix by reducing costly deposits to control costs. Adopting IFRS-9 led to a 4x increase in provisioning expenses, reaching PKR 5.4bln. These factors, along with high-cost deposits and lower advances, resulted in a loss of PKR 4bln for 9MCY24. To address this, the Bank issued PKR 1.5bln Tier-II subordinated debt to various investors, while, the sponsor injected PKR 6bln in equity, raising the CAR to 16.1% by end-Sep24. With improved risk absorption capacity, the Bank plans to expand its advances, and lower funding costs are anticipated in a low-interest-rate environment, going forward.

Sustainability

HBL MfB has upgraded the Customer Origination System (LoS) to a Customer Management Solution (CMS) – an end-to-end digital model used to automate the processes and reduce the turnaround time.

Financial Risk
Credit Risk

As of end-Dec23, gross advances rose by 14.9% to ~PKR 100.9bln (end-Dec22: PKR 87.9bln), with Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) increasing to PKR 2.7bln (Dec22: PKR 2.1bln), raising the infection ratio to 3% (Dec22: 2%). By end-Sep24, gross advances were reported at PKR 94.7bln, while NPLs climbed to PKR 9.5bln amid the wheat price crash, credit crunch in south punjab region, weather impacts and IFRS-9 adoption, pushing the infection ratio to 10%. While the write off was reported at PKR 2.8bln as of end Sep'24.

Market Risk

The Bank’s investment portfolio decreased by approximately 9% year-over-year to PKR 27.6bln at end-Dec23 (Dec22: PKR 30.4bln), primarily in government securities, though it increased to PKR 40.4bln by end-Sep24. The deposit base rose 10% year-over-year to PKR 128.2bln (end-Dec22: PKR 116.1bln), while total borrowings showed a modest rise, reaching PKR 9.3bln (end-Dec22: PKR 8.6bln).

Funding

The gross advances-to-deposit ratio (ADR) climbed to 76.1% (end-Dec22: 73.6%) due to the expanded advances portfolio for CY23. However, at end-Sep24, deposits stood at PKR 118.5bln, and total borrowings increased to PKR 13.7bln, with secured borrowings from financial institutions amounting to PKR 10.2bln, followed by subordinated debt at PKR 3.5bln.

Cashflows & Coverages

The Bank witnessed an improvement in its liquidity profile, as evident by the liquid assets to borrowings and deposits inclined to 44.7% at end-Sep24 (end-Dec23: 35.6%) driven by an increase in liquid investments.

Capital Adequacy

The Bank's equity base grew to PKR 14.2bln by end-Dec23 (end-Dec22: PKR 13.2bln, 9MCY24: PKR 15.7bln) due to sponsor capital injection and profitability, with a CAR of 15.3% (end-Dec22: 16.4%), meeting SBP’s minimum requirement. By end-Sep24, equity further strengthened to PKR 15.7bln, following an additional PKR 6bln from the sponsor, boosting the CAR to 16.1% and providing ample exposure capacity.

 
 

Dec-24

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
9M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
Dec-21
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Total Finances - net 85,159 98,190 85,709 56,913
2. Investments 40,398 27,553 30,395 13,730
3. Other Earning Assets 1,227 4,659 2,237 24,534
4. Non-Earning Assets 29,536 29,638 24,517 14,885
5. Non-Performing Finances-net 1,816 (665) (332) (40)
Total Assets 158,136 159,375 142,526 110,021
6. Deposits 118,530 128,234 116,063 91,363
7. Borrowings 13,735 9,341 8,571 4,883
8. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 10,145 7,586 4,665 3,692
Total Liabilities 142,410 145,160 129,299 99,937
Equity 15,726 14,215 13,226 10,083
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Mark Up Earned 25,338 33,228 24,060 15,276
2. Mark Up Expensed (19,824) (22,497) (13,641) (6,294)
3. Non Mark Up Income 1,486 2,548 2,109 1,430
Total Income 7,000 13,280 12,528 10,412
4. Non-Mark Up Expenses (8,092) (9,838) (8,181) (6,353)
5. Provisions/Write offs/Reversals (5,387) (2,782) (2,581) (1,884)
Pre-Tax (Loss)/Profit (6,480) 660 1,766 2,175
6. Taxes 2,441 (255) (541) (619)
(Loss)/Profit After Tax (4,039) 405 1,225 1,556
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
Portfolio Yield 28.7% 32.3% 29.5% 28.4%
Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS) 80.1% 101.9% 107.2% 115.0%
Return on Equity -36.0% 3.0% 10.5% 18.6%
2. Capital Adequacy
Net NPL/Equity 11.6% -4.7% -2.5% -0.4%
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 9.9% 8.9% 9.3% 9.2%
Tier I Capital / Risk Weighted Assets 11.3% 10.9% 12.3% 12.4%
Capital Adequacy Ratio 16.1% 15.3% 16.4% 17.0%
3. Funding & Liquidity
Liquid Assets as a % of Deposits & Short term Borrowings 44.7% 35.6% 38.6% 48.3%
Funding Diversification (Deposits/(Deposits+Borrowings+Grants)) 89.6% 93.2% 93.1% 94.9%
Net Advances to Deposits Ratio 73.4% 76.1% 73.6% 62.2%

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-24

www.pacra.com