Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
23-Dec-24 A- A2 Developing Maintain YES
22-Dec-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
23-Dec-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Dec-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Dec-20 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited, incorporated in 1996 and listed on the PSX, is primarily engaged in manufacturing and selling tin plates, cans, and steel products. The Rafi Family holds the controlling stake, with ~39.61% shares directly and ~15.49% indirectly through Siddiqsons Limited. The remaining shareholding 45% is held by individuals and financial institutions. The Board of Directors, led by Chairman Mr. Tariq Rafi, consists of seven members: two independent directors, three non-executive directors (all representing the Rafi Family), and two executive directors, including the CEO. Mr. Rafi is a seasoned business professional with a track record of successful ventures.

Rating Rationale

The assigned rating of Siddiqsons Tinplate Limited ("STPL" or the "Company") takes prime comfort based on the past proclivity from the sponsors to extend all support financial and otherwise in this time of need. They are fully aware of the current scenario and intend to take the company back on growth trajectory. In recent years, the Company faced significant challenges that impacted the demand for its tinplates i.e. reduction in sales due to tax exemptions in the FATA/PATA region and increased usage of Galvalume in food packaging instead of tinplates. These challenges have led to a decline in production utilization from 25% to 7% over the last three years. To address these issues, SSTPL is engaging with the health commission to highlight the health hazards of using Galvalume in food packaging and working to establish effective controls over sales and income tax exemptions on tinplate imports in the FATA/PATA region, which are being sold in the Pakistani market. Despite these challenges, the Company’s customer base remains intact, reflecting its strong customer profile. SSTPL is also diversifying by exploring export markets in America and the USA, where it has received letters of intent from customers to purchase tinplates. Furthermore, the implementation of anti-dumping duties on Galvalume and the removal of tax exemptions in FATA/PATA are expected to significantly strengthen local demand for tinplates, contributing to the Company’s profitability.
In relation to the arbitration matter in Singapore with supplier 'New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co. Limited (NHMG), an award was rendered by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ("SIAC") and ordered cost of S$35mln to be paid by STPL to NHMG. Being dissatisfied with the award, STPL filed an Application to Set Aside the Award before the Singapore High Court, which is currently pending adjudication. According to STPL's counsel, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, strong points have been raised that may lead the Court to rule in favor of STPL. The next hearing is in Mar'2025. Ongoing litigation has prompted the auditor to recommend claim provisioning, delaying audited accounts for Jun'2024 as STPL's management negotiates. An extension has been filed with PSX. Sponsors remain optimistic, believing successful mediation will secure the Company's sustainability and promising future.
The Company’s revenue declined by ~16% to PKR 3,030mln in 9MFY24 (9MFY23: PKR 3,628mln), with a loss after tax of PKR 174mln (9MFY23: PKR 112mln). Equity remains adequate at PKR 3,047mln as of March 2024. Management asserts the Company faces no significant financial risk due to its low-leverage capital structure. Debt obligations are being met with support from its parent, Siddiqson Limited, supporting its credit rating.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon Company’s ability to meet its debt obligations and sponsor's commitment to provide financial support to STPL in the event of any contingency/shortfall in cash flows of STPL.

Profile
Legal Structure

Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited ("STPL" or the "Company"), incorporated as a public listed company in 1996, is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Its registered office is in Karachi, with production facilities located in Karachi, Sindh, and Windhur, Balochistan.

Background

The Company, established in collaboration with Sollac of France and Mitsubishi Corporation of Japan, commenced commercial operations in May 1999 and added a canning facility in Malir, Karachi, in 2009.

Operations

STPL manufactures and sells Electrolytic Tin Plates (ETP), cans, and other steel products, operating under a B2B model. Its tin plate plant has an installed capacity of 120,000 MT per annum, while the canning facility produces up to 4,015,000 cans annually.

Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Rafi Family holds a controlling ~55% stake in the Company directly and ~15% indirectly through Siddiqsons Limited, which is fully owned by the family. The remaining 30% shares are held by other individuals.

Stability

The Rafi Family has held controlling shareholding in the Company since its inception, though no formal succession plan is in place.

Business Acumen

The sponsor family has strong working knowledge as they are operating in the industry since 1996 and are the only manufacturer of tin plate in Pakistan. The Company's founder, Mr. Tariq Rafi, has been associated with the textile business since 1959 and carries vast knowledge and experience of the industry.

Financial Strength

The Rafi Family, with a diverse portfolio in banking, energy, real estate, and metals, has a proven capacity to provide timely financial support to the Company. Their strong financial strength is evident through past assistance, including a rights issue to fund Capex and support for the recent expansion project. Continued support is expected if needed. The equity of Siddiqsons Limited was reported at PKR 16.5bln, with a profit after tax (PAT) of PKR 1.375bln.

Governance
Board Structure

The Company's seven-member Board includes two independent directors, three non-executive directors, and two executive directors (including the CEO). Chaired by Mr. Tariq Rafi, all non-independent directors represent the Rafi Family.

Members’ Profile

Mr. Tariq Rafi, Chairman of the Board, is also serving his responsibilities as the director on the Board of MCB Bank Limited, Centrak Depository Company, Siddiqsons Limited, Siddiqsons Energy Limited, & Canvas Company of Pakistan (Pvt) Limited. Mr. Rafi joinged STPL since the inception of the Company. Mr. Munir Qureshi, Executive Director, is an engineer with a graduate degree in public administration from Harvard University. A certified director under the Code of Corporate Governance, he has been a member of STPL's Board since 2015. Mr.Ibrahim Shamsi, non-executive director, has vast experience of modern management and effective control management. He is the CEO of Aladin Water and Amusement Park, Karachi and Joyland, Lahore. He is also serving as the director of Adam Jee Insurance Company Limited, the largest insurance Company of Pakistan. Ms. Alia Sajjad, a non-executive director, joined the Board in 2018. She is the Executive Director of Siddiqsons Limited and serves as COO of Triple Tree Associates, overseeing the company's finance, marketing, and operational affairs. Mr. Abdul Wahab, Independent director, joined the Board in 2018 and has experience in business management. Mr. Ashraf Mahmood Wathra, an independent director since 2018, brings 35 years of experience in commercial, corporate, and investment banking. He has represented Pakistan at various international forums and held leadership roles in national and international banks prior to joining the State Bank of Pakistan.

Board Effectiveness

The Board met four times during FY23 with most of the directors attending four or more meetings. The Board has established four sub-committees, i) Audit Committee, ii) Human Resource & Remuneration Committee and iii) Technical Committee. Both committees are chaired by non-executive directors.

Financial Transparency

Yousuf Adil, Chartered Accountants, serve as the Company's external auditors. They issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023. Their limited review report for the half-year ended December 31, 2023, includes an emphasis of matter paragraph highlighting the contingency related to the New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co. Limited case. The Board has established an internal audit department that reports directly to the Board Audit Committee.

Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a well-defined management structure with functional departments and clear responsibilities.

Management Team

The management team is led by Mr. Naeem ul Hasnain Mirza, the CEO of the Company. An Electrical Engineer, Mr. Naeem began his career with STPL in 1999 and has served in various management roles across operational areas during his 23-year tenure. He was appointed CEO of Siddiqsons Tin Plate in 2022.

Effectiveness

The Company has established two management committees to coordinate its operations, namely, i) Technical Committee, and ii) Procurement Committee. Technical committee is the apex management committee. The committees meet on requirement basis. Technical Management Team, including the CEO, Director Commercial, CFO, GM Commercial, and GM Marketing.

MIS

The Company has implemented Sidat Hyder Financials suit to manage the financial information needs of management. Further, the Company has implemented in house developed softwares to manage stock and stores. The management is also running a separate payroll software to process payroll data.

Control Environment

The management has a strong control environment. There exists an established internal audit function which includes three members comprising the Head of Internal Audit. The head of Internal audit reports directly to the audit committee.

Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The industry can be divided into two segments, namely, i) Local manufacturers, and ii) Commercial Importers of ETP. Siddiqsons Tin Plate is the only tin plate manufacturer in Pakistan, while there are several commercial importers of ETP. The total market size of Tin plate coil was declined significantly during CY23 and onwards on the back of reduction in sales due to tax exemptions in the FATA/PATA region and increased usage of Galvalume in food packaging instead of tinplates. As per management representation, these challenges have led to a decline in production utilization from 25% to 7% over the last three years. The implementation of anti-dumping duties on Galvalume and the removal of tax exemptions in FATA/PATA are expected to significantly strengthen local demand for tinplates

Capacity Utilization
Relative Position

The Company is the only tin plate manufacturer in Pakistan and as per management representation holds an adequate share of the total market. The other competitors are various small commercial importers of tin plate.

Revenues

During the 9MFY24 period ending March 2024, the Company’s sales revenue declined by 16%, reaching PKR 3,030mln. The cost of sales also saw a decline of 12%. This decline was primarily due to negative sales volume caused by raw material shortages, unfavorable market conditions such as the availability of inexpensive tinplate due to misuse of sales tax exemptions in the FATA/PATA region, and the use of Galvalume steel in food packaging despite health concerns. Additionally, a significant 80% increase in finance costs compared to the same period last year continued to impact profitability. The Company reported a loss after tax of PKR 173.8mln (9MFY23: PKR 112mln).

Margins

In FY23, the gross margin and operating profit margin both decreased as compared to FY22. The GP margin decreased from ~13.1% in FY22 to ~9.1% in FY23 due huge rise in manufacturing cost while the OP margin decreased from ~9.1% to ~4.7% during the same period. Resultantly, the net margin of the Company decreased to ~0.1% during FY23 (FY22: ~4.3%, FY21: ~5.5%) due to high finance. The Company posted a net profit of ~PKR 3mln in FY23 (FY22: ~PKR 201mln, FY21: ~PKR 322mln).

Revenue and Margins
Sustainability

SSTPL is also diversifying by exploring export markets in America and the USA, where it has received letters of intent from customers to purchase tinplates. Furthermore, the implementation of anti-dumping duties on Galvalume and the removal of tax exemptions in FATA/PATA are expected to significantly strengthen local demand for tinplates, contributing to the Company’s profitability. As a sponsor, Siddiqsons Limited remains committed to providing financial support to SSTPL in the event of any contingency/shortfall in cash flows of SSTPL.

Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s net working capital days decreased to 83 days as of March 2024 from 110 days. Management has actively optimized working capital by improving supply chain management and negotiating favorable terms with its primary raw material supplier. Additionally, trade receivable days were reduced by adjusting credit terms with customers and shifting a significant portion to advance cash sales.

Coverages

In 9MFY24, the Company’s EBITDA declined to approximately PKR 279mln from PKR 353mln in FY23, primarily due to a significant drop in PBT. The EBITDA/Finance Cost coverage ratio decreased from ~1.9x in FY23 to ~0.8x in 9MFY24, while the FCFO/Finance Cost ratio fell to ~0.7x

Coverages
Capitalization

Siddiqsons Tinplate Limited has a moderately leveraged structure, with total leverage at approximately 42.7% as of Mar'2024 (up from 40.8% in Jun'2023). The Company's short-term borrowings decreased significantly from PKR 2,132mlm in Dec'2023 to PKR 1,589mln in Mar'2024. According to management, the short-term borrowings have further declined by PKR 1bln, paid off through the sale of ancillary equipment from the CRC project, resulting in a significant reduction in the Company’s debt burden.

Capitalization
 
 

Dec-24

www.pacra.com


Mar-24
9M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
Jun-21
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,174 4,138 3,491 2,898
2. Investments 256 256 220 169
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 1,865 1,712 2,832 2,048
a. Inventories 1,116 886 1,567 610
b. Trade Receivables 178 187 324 522
5. Total Assets 6,295 6,106 6,543 5,115
6. Current Liabilities 980 667 406 409
a. Trade Payables 273 265 59 155
7. Borrowings 1,909 1,745 2,918 1,606
8. Related Party Exposure 358 473 0 82
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0 1
10. Net Assets 3,047 3,221 3,218 3,017
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,047 3,221 3,218 3,017
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,030 4,394 4,723 5,848
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,690) (3,994) (4,103) (5,044)
2. Gross Profit 340 400 619 803
a. Operating Expenses (104) (195) (187) (240)
3. Operating Profit 237 205 432 564
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 16 61 (6) (37)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 252 266 426 527
a. Total Finance Cost (427) (215) (168) (125)
b. Taxation 1 (48) (57) (80)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (174) 3 201 322
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 252 216 439 426
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (129) 11 315 305
c. Changes in Working Capital (17) 1,217 (722) 500
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (146) 1,228 (406) 804
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (23) (710) (674) (497)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (159) (1,237) 1,336 (861)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (328) (719) 256 (553)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -8.1% -7.0% -19.2% 64.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 11.2% 9.1% 13.1% 13.7%
c. Net Profit Margin -5.7% 0.1% 4.3% 5.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 7.7% 32.6% -6.0% 15.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -7.4% 0.1% 6.5% 11.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 107 123 117 98
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 83 110 109 89
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.9 2.6 7.0 5.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 0.8 1.9 3.6 5.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.3 0.7 2.4 2.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -8.1 32.7 1.7 0.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 42.7% 40.8% 47.6% 35.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 99.2 163.8 187.9 91.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 19.4% 7.0% 6.9% 5.3%

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-24

www.pacra.com