Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
22-Nov-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
23-Feb-24 A+ A1 Stable Upgrade -
22-Nov-23 A A1 Stable Maintain -
22-Nov-22 A A1 Stable Maintain -
22-Nov-21 A A1 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Airlink is a public listed company primarily engaged in the distribution and assembly of mobile phones and allied products. Mr. Muzaffar Hayat Piracha (CEO) and the family own a majority stake of ~73.43% in the Company while the remaining shareholding rests with the general public, insurance companies, banks, DFIs, NBFIs, and others.

Rating Rationale

Air Link Communication Limited (‘Airlink’ or ‘the Company’) primarily operates in two business verticals; i) mobile phone distribution and retail, and ii) assembly of smartphones and related products in Pakistan. The Company’s ratings reflect its robust business fundamentals across both segments, underpinned by its growing market position and strategic partnerships with leading global brands, ensuring a diversified earnings portfolio. The ratings are further supported by the strong governance structure and presence of a professional management team that spearheaded the Company to achieve impressive growth in its topline along with the sustainability of a healthy profitability matrix. As per the data published by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), Pakistan’s mobile teledensity has reached ~80%. Over the past few years, the mobile industry has rapidly shifted from relying on imported devices to locally assembled products. During 9MCY24, ~22.59mln devices were assembled locally, while commercial import accounted for ~1.17mln devices, representing a ~42% growth on an annualized basis, compared to ~21.28mln assembled and ~1.58mln imported devices in CY23. Airlink is actively engaged in the assembly of Tecno smartphones, besides being the sole assembler of Xiaomi smartphones through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Select Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd. Moreover, Airlink is among the largest distributors in the country, commanding a market share of ~22% in the distribution segment. The Company has established an extensive nationwide network linked with over 16 hubs and regional offices, more than 1100 wholesalers, and 4,000 retailers, supported by after-sales service centers in all major cities. During FY24, Airlink reported a consolidated topline of PKR 129,742mln, marking a substantial growth compared to last year, primarily driven by higher volumes, following the relaxation of import restrictions on mobile CKDs, which allowed the Company to operate at optimal capacity. Concurrently. rising mobile phone prices also supported the revenue growth. The assembly segment contributed ~72% to the overall revenue while the contribution from the distribution segment remained ~28%. The Company’s net profit margin improved marginally during the year, exhibiting a consolidated profit after tax of PKR 4,624mln. However, in 1QFY25, the revenue declined by ~40% on an annualized basis, due to inventory build-up and dampened demand, exacerbated by price increases linked to additional tax implications. Airlink’s financial risk profile is characterized by an improved working capital cycle, comfortable coverages, and healthy cashflows. Capital structure is leveraged where short-term borrowings comprise ~87.9% of the total debt portfolio. Moving forward, the Company is focused on diversifying its product range by introducing Xiaomi smart TVs. Additionally, the Company has finalized an exclusive agreement with Acer Gadget Inc. to assemble and market their product range comprising laptops and tablets in Pakistan which is expected to further solidify the Company’s profile.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent on the Company’s ability to sustain its market position amidst a rapidly changing industry environment. As business grows, prudent financial discipline, particularly regarding the working capital structure and leverage, is essential to uphold the ratings. A principle to which management is fully committed.

Profile
Legal Structure

Air Link Communication Limited ('Airlink' or 'the Company') is a public limited company, incorporated in January 2014 under the repealed Companies Ordinance 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The Company has been listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) since September 2021. The registered office of the Company is located at 152/1-M, Quaid-e-Azam Industrial Estate, Kotlakhpat, Lahore.

Background

Airlink commenced business as a partnership firm in 2010, engaged in the import & distribution of IT products, particularly mobile phones, & related services. In 2014, a new private company was incorporated to take over the business of the partnership firm running as a family business. Subsequently, the entire business was transferred to the Company's books in 2018. Later, Airlink converted its status to a Public Unlisted Company in April 2019. and eventually was listed on PSX in September 2021.

Operations

Airlink's core operations include production of Tecno smartphones along with distribution of mobile phones and allied products of the leading brands in the mobile industry, including; Xiaomi, Techno, Samsung, iPhone, and Itel. Furthermore, Airlink partnered with Xiaomi to manufacture and distribute Xiaomi mobile phones & accessories in Pakistan through its wholly owned subsidiary "Select Technologies (Private) Limited".

Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority stake rests with the members of the sponsoring family, holding ~73.43% of shares. Additionally, ~8.07% is owned by the general public, ~5.75% is held by foreign companies, ~5.91% is held cumulatively by banks, development finance institutions, non-banking finance institutions, insurance companies, modarabas and mutual funds, ~2% is held by directors, their spouses and minor children whereas the remaining ~4.83% is owned by others.

Stability

The ownership structure of the Company is seen as stable as the majority stake of the Company is held by the members of the sponsoring family, and no significant changes are expected in the ownership structure of the Company in the foreseeable future.

Business Acumen

Mr. Muzzaffar Hayat Piracha, the primary sponsor, has been at the helm of the Company since its inception. He is a seasoned professional with a deep understanding of the industry. His strong leadership capabilities are evidenced by the successful strategic partnerships the Company has cultivated over the years. His business acumen is thus considered strong.

Financial Strength

Owners of the Company do not have any strategic stake in other companies. However, Mr. Muzaffar Hayat owns commercial and residential real estate. Financial strength is, therefore, considered adequate.

Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (the Board) comprises seven members: two non-executive directors (including the chairman and a female director), two executive directors (including the CEO), and three independent directors.

Members’ Profile

Members of the Board are seasoned professionals and bring extensive multifunctional experience across multiple sectors. Mr. Aslam Hayat Piracha is the chairman of the Board and possesses over 5 decades of business experience with core speciality in imports and exports. He is keenly involved in overseeing the systems and controls of Airlink. Furthermore, the independent directors are well regarded business experts having bringing exposure from diverse sectors.

Board Effectiveness

The Board meets at least quarterly to oversee the management's performance and to ensure alignment of the Company with its strategic goals. During FY24, four meetings of the Board were held, and the attendance of directors remained strong. Minutes of the meetings are documented appropriately, and action points are communicated with the relevant stakeholders. The Board has also established two committees: i) Audit Committee, and ii) HR and Remuneration Committee. These committees further enhance the Board's effectiveness by enabling focused oversight and efficient decision making.

Financial Transparency

M/S BDO Ebrahim & Co. Chartered Accountants, listed in the category ‘A’ on SBP's panel of auditors, are the external auditors of the Company. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30th, 2024.

Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a well-defined organizational structure segregated into eight functional departments including: Human Resources, Production, Retail, Operations, Internal Audit, Marketing, Distribution, and Accounts & Finance. All the departments are led by professional Heads of Departments who report directly to the CEO. Currently, all the key positions are filled.

Management Team

Mr. Muzaffar Hayat Piracha leads the management team as the CEO of the Company. He has a Master's Degree in Business Administration and possesses over two decades of multifaceted leadership experience across diverse sectors with exposure to local and European markets. He is supported by a management team of seasoned professionals bringing extensive expertise and experience. Notably, Mr. Adnan Aftab, the CEO of Select Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd., has a Master's degree in Manufacturing Engineering and possesses over three decades of experience in manufacturing. Furthermore, Mr. Nusrat Mahmood, the CFO, is a distinguished Management Accountant and Chemical Engineer with over two decades of experience across multiple industries including textiles, fertilizers, and telecommunications.

Effectiveness

There exists a multi-layered hierarchy within each functional department. The roles and responsibilities of each cadre are properly defined and documented which strengthens the effectiveness of the management. Furthermore, six management committees have been established namely, i) Credit Committee, ii) Risk Management Committee, iii) Sale Control Committee, iv) Cash Management Committee, v) Operational Control Committee, and vi) Business Plan Committee, which help in improving overall operational efficacy by enabling focused decision making and bridging inter-departmental gaps.

MIS

The Company has installed SAP, an ERP solution, as its information system, which enables the Company to maintain a sound reporting system.

Control Environment

An internal audit department is in place which reports directly to the Board’s audit committee. MIS reports for senior management are generated frequently and are detailed in nature. Many reports, including the following, are generated for each business unit: i) region-wise business partner report including adjustments, ii) daily stock report for all warehouses, and iii) product-wise report of region & corporate limits.

Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan has been one of the fastest-growing cellular markets. The country’s tele density rose from 6% in FY04 to a high of 80% as of FY24. The devaluation of PKR against the USD during the preceding year and the rise in duty structure amplified the prices of imported phones, hence putting pressure on the demand for high-end mobile phones. During 9MCY24, the local production of mobile phones was recorded at 22.59mln units comprising 8.73mln 2G devices and 13.86mln smartphones while commercial imports were recorded at 1.17mln units. compared to ~21.28mln devices manufactured locally and ~1.58mln imported during CY23. Currently, there are 4 top distributors in the country. Airlink ranks number one on the list and holds ~22% of the market share.

Relative Position

Airlink is among the top 4 mobile phone distributors in the country. The Company is working with the world's top brands of mobile phones. In FY24, Xiaomi (52%), Techno (44%), and Samsung (4%) were among the highest contributors to the Company's distribution volume. Furthermore, the Company is the sole manufacturer of Xiaomi smartphones in the country and also manufactures Tecno smartphones signifying prominent position of the Company within the mobile phone manufacturing and distribution industry.

Revenues

In FY24, Airlink recorded a consolidated topline of PKR 129,742mln (FY23: 36,934mln) reflecting a substantial growth compared to last year, on account of ease in import restrictions on CKDs of mobile phones resulting in improved volumes in the mobile phones assembling segment enabling the Company to utilize its optimal capacity. During the year, the assembly segment contributed ~PKR 93,346mln (72%) whereas the contribution from the distribution segment remained ~PKR 36,396mln (28%). Furthermore, the diversity of associated brands with the distribution segment including Samsung, Tecno, Itel, Xiaomi, TCL/Alcatel, iPhone and Realme augments the revenue stream and safeguards against any uncertain fluctuations in the demand or supply of any brand. During 1QFY25, the Company’s sales declined by ~40% on an annualized basis, on account of inventory build-up and dampened demand due to price increase on the back of additional tax implications.

Margins

A slight decline in the gross profit margin was observed during FY24 as it decreased to ~7.6% from ~9.6% in FY23, primarily attributable to the effect of higher pricing of the imported components/parts. However, the net profit margin improved to ~3.6% during the year compared to ~2.6% in FY23, primarily on account of better cost management and capacity utilization enabling the company to achieve economies of scale. During 1QFY25, further improvement in the profitability matrix was observed as reflected by the gross profit margin of ~9.8% and net profit margin of ~3.8%.

Sustainability

Airlink is among the largest distributors of mobile phone and related devices in the country. Over the years, the Company has steadily strengthened its business profile by cultivating partnerships with globally renowned brands to ensure growth and sustainability. In 2022, Airlink joined hands with Xiaomi Global to assemble and distribute its mobile phones. Recently, the Company has finalized an agreement with Acer Inc. for the production of Acer laptops and tablets. Furthermore, the Company is also diversifying its product range by commencing assembly of Xiaomi Smart Tvs. These initiatives are expected to further solidify the Company's prospects.

Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company's working capital needs stem primarily from funding its inventory in the assembly and distribution segments. During FY24, average gross working capital days significantly decreased, and were recorded at ~30 days compared to 94 days in FY23, primarily attributable to robust inventory management. This also resulted in decreased average net working capital days of the Company to ~18 days in FY24 compared to ~70 days in FY23. However, the working capital cycle days increased during 1QFY25 on account of inventory build-up to meet the demand of Xiaomi Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.

Coverages

Free cash flow from operations (FCFO) increased to PKR ~8,578mln in FY24 compared to PKR ~2,874mln in FY23, on account of an increase in profit before tax. This resulted in the improvement in core coverages of the Company as reflected by the interest coverage ratio of 3.3x during FY24, compared to 2.1x in FY23. Debt payment capacity currently remains comfortable as reflected by the Debt payback ratio of 0.5 times in FY24 compared to 2.1 times in FY23. Furthermore, the Company’s interest and debt coverages remained intact during 1QFY25.

Capitalization

The total debt of Airlink increased during the review period. As of Sep-24, it was recorded at PKR ~16,124mln (FY23: PKR ~8,302mln FY22: PKR ~8,021mln). The Company has a leveraged capital structure as reflected by the leverage ratio of ~53% as of Sep-24. (FY23: 40.4%, FY22: 40.8%, FY21: 53.3%). The debt book is dominated by short-term loans, which constitute ~88% of the total debt portfolio, and are being utilized to fund the growing working capital needs.

 
 

Nov-24

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
3M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 8,460 8,571 6,186 6,172
2. Investments 3,829 4,202 3,484 1,010
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 26,259 27,745 18,964 14,479
a. Inventories 8,829 8,109 7,175 5,334
b. Trade Receivables 5,536 3,527 2,714 3,753
5. Total Assets 38,548 40,518 28,635 21,660
6. Current Liabilities 7,901 8,604 7,796 1,725
a. Trade Payables 0 3,899 4,715 47
7. Borrowings 16,124 16,419 8,302 8,021
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 193 426 312 258
10. Net Assets 14,330 15,069 12,225 11,656
11. Shareholders' Equity 14,330 15,069 12,225 11,656
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 22,052 129,742 36,934 49,166
a. Cost of Good Sold (19,882) (119,937) (33,399) (43,968)
2. Gross Profit 2,170 9,806 3,535 5,198
a. Operating Expenses (385) (1,312) (1,105) (1,548)
3. Operating Profit 1,785 8,493 2,430 3,649
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 124 83 266 132
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,909 8,577 2,696 3,781
a. Total Finance Cost (681) (2,974) (1,828) (1,175)
b. Taxation (386) (977) 93 (1,076)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 842 4,625 961 1,530
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,884 8,578 2,874 3,231
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 1,413 6,217 2,546 2,567
c. Changes in Working Capital (273) (9,041) 51 (970)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,140 (2,824) 2,597 1,597
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 573 (2,711) (2,793) (5,947)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (878) 6,803 115 4,620
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 835 1,267 (81) 269
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -32.0% 251.3% -24.9% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 9.8% 7.6% 9.6% 10.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.8% 3.6% 2.6% 3.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 7.3% -0.4% 7.9% 4.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 22.9% 33.9% 8.0% 13.1%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 54 30 94 67
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 38 18 70 67
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.3 3.2 2.4 8.4
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.1 3.3 2.1 4.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.2 2.4 1.3 2.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.4 0.5 2.1 1.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 52.9% 52.1% 40.4% 40.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 92.1 70.1 48.8 89.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 17.4% 21.3% 18.1% 10.5%

Nov-24

www.pacra.com

Nov-24

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-24

www.pacra.com